繁体   English   中英

使用隐式参数为部分函数定义新的TYPE

[英]Defining new TYPE for partial function with an implicit parameters

我正在尝试创建一个具有部分函数模式的新TYPE。 例:

新类型

type RouteFunc = (String, HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse) => Unit

用法

def myFunc(str:字符串,请求:HttpServletRequest,响应HttpServletResponse)myFunc(“”,Any,Any)

对于显式传递的参数,这确实很好用,但是我想更改此类型定义,以便将HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse隐式与显式传递。

预期结果

def myFunc(str: String)(implicit request: HttpServletRequest, response HttpServletResponse)

我找不到一种方法来更改TYPE结构/定义以适应预期的模式,这是可能的还是语言的限制?

编辑

用法:

object Routes{
    type RouteFunc = (String, HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse) => Unit

    val routes = Map[String, RouteFunc](
        "/data" -> DataSets.dashboard
    )

    def evaluateRoute()(implicit request: HttpServletRequest, response: HttpServletResponse) = {
        val path = request.getPathInfo

        val route = routes(path)
        route(path, request, response)
    }
}
object DataSets{
    def dashboard(path: String, request: HttpServletRequest, response: HttpServletResponse) = {
        response.setContentType("text/html")
        response.setCharacterEncoding("UTF-8")

        response.getWriter.write("Hello World")
    }
}

我希望def dashboard看起来像:

def dashboard(path: String)(implicit request: HttpServletRequest, response: HttpServletResponse)

编辑2

最后,我明确地传递了参数,因为对于@SergGr和@slouc所解释的当前版本的Scala,这是不可能的:

import javax.servlet.http.{HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse}
import controllers.data._
import Routes._

class RoutingController() extends JettyHttpServlet {

    type RouteFunc = (String, HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse) => Unit
    type HttpRequest = String
    type Path = String

    val routes = Map[(String, HttpRequest), RouteFunc](
        (GET,       "/data")                -> Data.dashboard,
        (GET,       "/assets/*")            -> Assets.getAsset

    )

    override def Get()(implicit request: HttpServletRequest, response: HttpServletResponse): Unit = {
        val path = request.getPathInfo
        val pathTerms = path.split("/")
        val getPaths = routes.filter(_._1._1 == request.getMethod.toUpperCase)

        val filteredList = getPaths.flatMap{
            route =>
                if(route._1._2 == path){
                    Option(route)
                }else {
                    val s = route._1._2.split("/")

                    if(route._1._2.startsWith("/assets")){
                        Option(route)
                    }else
                        None
                }
        }.toSeq

        filteredList.head._2(path, request, response)
    }

}

----------------------

import jetty.Routes
import jetty.Responses._

object Data {

    import javax.servlet.http.{HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse}

    def dashboard(path: String, eq: HttpServletRequest, qw: HttpServletResponse): Unit = {
            implicit val s = eq
            implicit val r = qw
        Ok(Routes.html, views.html.data.dashboard.render("Dashboard").toString())
    }

}

如果我的问题正确无误,您想使用隐式参数定义一个函数。 这是不可能的。 它不仅是一种语言约束,而且还是一种逻辑约束。 函数是一个数学概念,那里没有所谓的“隐式参数”。 无法提供参数的子集,而其余部分则“从作用域”中获取。

在Scala中,有一种方法可以将方法转换为函数。 有问题的机制称为eta扩展。 给定一些方法fooMethod,则可以将对应的函数fooFunction定义为

def fooMethod(i: Input): Output
val fooFunction: Input => Output = (i: Input) => fooMethod(i)

// or

def fooMethod(i1: Input1, i2: Input2): Output
val fooFunction: Input1 => Input2 => Output = (i1: Input1) => (i: Input2) => fooMethod(i1, i2)

// or

def fooMethod(): Output
val fooFunction: Unit => Output = () => fooMethod()

如果您提供了需要函数的方法,则编译器将自动执行eta扩展。 如果无法自动执行,则可以手动执行:

val fooFunction = fooMethod _

但是,由于前面提到的原因,如果您引入隐式参数,即使该技巧也失败了。

例:

trait HttpServletRequest
trait HttpServletResponse

type RouteFunc = String => (HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse) => Unit

implicit val request = new HttpServletRequest {}
implicit val response = new HttpServletResponse {}

def myMethod1(str: String)(request: HttpServletRequest, response: HttpServletResponse) = println("1")
def myMethod2(str: String)(implicit request: HttpServletRequest, response: HttpServletResponse) = println("2")

val myFunc1: RouteFunc = myMethod1 _ // compiles fine
val myFunc2: RouteFunc = myMethod2 _ // nope

编辑:

鉴于您的编辑,这就是我的做法:

trait HttpServletRequest
trait HttpServletResponse

object Routes {

  implicit val request = new HttpServletRequest {}
  implicit val response = new HttpServletResponse {}

  type RouteFunc = String => Unit
  val routes = Map[String, RouteFunc]("/data" -> DataSets.dashboard())
}

object DataSets {

  def dashboard()(implicit request: HttpServletRequest, response: HttpServletResponse): RouteFunc =
    (path: String) => {
      // impl of dashboard, uses request and response
  }
}

您将路由定义为功能String => Unit ,并将仪表板定义为采用隐式请求和响应并为您构造路由的方法。

编辑2:

似乎在将来的Scala版本之一中将提供对带有隐式参数的函数的支持。 我不喜欢这样,我不会使用它,即使没有它,我们在Scala中也会有太多隐含的地狱,但是很高兴知道这一点,这样我就不会一直声称这是不可能的:)

从Scala 2.12开始不支持隐式函数。 看起来当Dotty成为Scala的官方编译器时,他们计划将其用于更高版本中的一个

暂无
暂无

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM