Java编译器是否优化了流过滤？

Question

我们有一个案例：

x.stream().filter(X::isFlag).filter(this::isOtherFlag).reduce(...)

它与这个不同吗？

x.stream().filter(predicate(X::isFlag).and(this::isOtherFlag)).reduce(...)

Answer 1

从功能上讲，这两个陈述是等价的。 但是，请考虑以下两个代码块及其各自的字节码：

public static void main(String[] args) {
    List<String> list = List.of("Seven", "Eight", "Nine");

    list.stream().filter(s -> s.length() >= 5)
                 .filter(s -> s.contains("n"))
                 .forEach(System.out::println);
}

public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
Code:
   0: ldc           #16                 // String Seven
   2: ldc           #18                 // String Eight
   4: ldc           #20                 // String Nine
   6: invokestatic  #22                 // InterfaceMethod java/util/List.of:(Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/util/List;
   9: astore_1
  10: aload_1
  11: invokeinterface #28,  1           // InterfaceMethod java/util/List.stream:()Ljava/util/stream/Stream;
  16: invokedynamic #35,  0             // InvokeDynamic #0:test:()Ljava/util/function/Predicate;
  21: invokeinterface #36,  2           // InterfaceMethod java/util/stream/Stream.filter:(Ljava/util/function/Predicate;)Ljava/util/stream/Stream;
  26: invokedynamic #42,  0             // InvokeDynamic #1:test:()Ljava/util/function/Predicate;
  31: invokeinterface #36,  2           // InterfaceMethod java/util/stream/Stream.filter:(Ljava/util/function/Predicate;)Ljava/util/stream/Stream;
  36: getstatic     #43                 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
  39: invokedynamic #52,  0             // InvokeDynamic #2:accept:(Ljava/io/PrintStream;)Ljava/util/function/Consumer;
  44: invokeinterface #53,  2           // InterfaceMethod java/util/stream/Stream.forEach:(Ljava/util/function/Consumer;)V
  49: return

-

public static void main(String[] args) {
    List<String> list = List.of("Seven", "Eight", "Nine");

    list.stream().filter(s -> s.length() >= 5 && s.contains("n"))
                 .forEach(System.out::println);
}

public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
Code:
   0: ldc           #16                 // String Seven
   2: ldc           #18                 // String Eight
   4: ldc           #20                 // String Nine
   6: invokestatic  #22                 // InterfaceMethod java/util/List.of:(Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/util/List;
   9: astore_1
  10: aload_1
  11: invokeinterface #28,  1           // InterfaceMethod java/util/List.stream:()Ljava/util/stream/Stream;
  16: invokedynamic #35,  0             // InvokeDynamic #0:test:()Ljava/util/function/Predicate;
  21: invokeinterface #36,  2           // InterfaceMethod java/util/stream/Stream.filter:(Ljava/util/function/Predicate;)Ljava/util/stream/Stream;
  26: getstatic     #42                 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
  29: invokedynamic #51,  0             // InvokeDynamic #1:accept:(Ljava/io/PrintStream;)Ljava/util/function/Consumer;
  34: invokeinterface #52,  2           // InterfaceMethod java/util/stream/Stream.forEach:(Ljava/util/function/Consumer;)V
  39: return

我们可以看到，在第二个例子中，缺少对invokedynamic和invokeinterface一次调用（这是有意义的，因为我们省略了对filter的调用）。 我确信有人可以帮助我对这个字节码进行静态分析（如果需要，我可以发布详细文件），但Java编译器明确将单个调用filter为单个Predicate<String>而不是将其拆分为operator && ，略微缩短字节码。