![](/img/trans.png)
[英]How to implement something like Try to get a value, if null then sleep a little without using Thread.sleep?
[英]How to implement exponential delay/sleep for try & catch
我正在尝试编写另一个装饰器,如下面的RetriableProcessorDecorator
(作为一个单独的类),以便它在重试时会出现指数延迟。 例如,如果消息无法处理,我们等待1秒钟(应可配置),然后等待2s,然后等待4s,然后等待8s,然后等待16s,依此类推。我想使用线程而不是忙等待,因为它比较便宜。 我写了一个新的RetriableProcessorExponentialDecorator
类来做到这一点,但是我不确定这是否是正确的方法。
RetriableProcessorDecorator.java:
@Slf4j
@Setter
@RequiredArgsConstructor
@AllArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PACKAGE)
public class RetriableProcessorDecorator implements.
AbsMessageProcessorDecorator {
private final AbsMessageProcessor messageProcessor;
@Autowired
private AbsMessageActiveMQConfiguration configuration;
@Override
public void onMessage(AbsMessage message) throws Exception {
int executionCounter = 0;
final int maxRetries = this.configuration.getExceptionRetry() + 1;
do {
executionCounter++;
try {
this.messageProcessor.onMessage(message);
} catch (RetriableException e) {
log.info("Failed to process message. Retry #{}", executionCounter);
} catch (Exception e) {
// We don't retry on this, only RetriableException.
throw e;
}
} while (executionCounter < maxRetries);
}
}
RetriableProcessorExponentialDecorator.java(我正在实现的新类):
public class RetriableProcessorExponentialDecorator implements AbsMessageProcessorDecorator {
private final AbsMessageProcessor messageProcessor;
@Autowired
private AbsMessageActiveMQConfiguration configuration;
@Override
public void onMessage(AbsMessage message) throws Exception {
int executionCounter = 0;
int delayCounter = 1000;
final int maxRetries = this.configuration.getExceptionRetry() + 1;
do {
executionCounter++;
try {
this.messageProcessor.onMessage(message);
} catch (RetriableException e) {
log.info("Failed to process message. Retry #{}", executionCounter);
Thread.sleep(delayCounter);
delayCounter = delayCounter * 2;
} catch (Exception e) {
// We don't retry on this, only RetriableException.
throw e;
}
} while (executionCounter < maxRetries && delayCounter < Long.MAX_VALUE);
}
}
总的来说,我认为您的方法很好。
但是,如果您想使其可配置(即更有用),则可以执行以下操作:
double multiplier = 2.0; // make this configurable
...
delayCounter = (long) (delayCounter * (Math.pow(multiplier, executionCounter)));
Thread.sleep(delayCounter);
您还可以添加一种方法来配置最大延迟,这对于某些用例可能很方便,例如:
long maxDelay = 300000; // 5 minutes
...
if (delayCounter > maxDelay) {
delayCounter = maxDelay;
}
Thread.sleep(delayCounter);
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.