[英]SPOCK: How to mock supplier behavior
我试图在CompletableFuture
内部执行supplier
时掩盖积极的消极情况。 由于某些原因,模拟值未在supplier
内部传递。 我的单元测试用例是使用spock框架编写的,由于我不太熟悉该框架,因此我不确定在进行模拟时我是否会犯错,或者供应商在进行模拟时会遗漏某些东西。
被测代码:
CompletableFuture
.supplyAsync(() -> s3Service.upload(bucket, key, file), executor)
.handle(((putObjectResult, throwable) -> {
if (throwable != null) {
CustomRuntimeException exception = (CustomRuntimeException) throwable;
log.error(exception);
}
return putObjectResult;
}))
.thenAccept(putObjectResult -> {
if (putObjectResult != null) {
FileUtils.deleteQuietly(file);
log.debug("Deleted file {}", file.getName());
}
});
Spock测试代码:
@SpringBean
private S3Service s3service = Mock()
def "failed to upload article into s3"() {
given: "mock the s3 service to throw CustomRuntimeException"
s3Service.upload(_, _, _) >> {
CompletableFuture<PutObjectResult> exception = new CompletableFuture<>();
exception.completeExceptionally(new CustomRuntimeException())
exception.exceptionally(new Function<Throwable, PutObjectResult>() {
@Override
PutObjectResult apply(Throwable throwable) {
throw new CompletionException(throwable)
}
})
}
现在,当我调试单元测试用例时, .handle
的throwable
实例始终为null
。 当我模拟PutObjectResult
时也发生了同样的情况
因此,似乎我对给定的理解以及何时与Mockito框架有所不同。 我已经将我的s3Service.upload(_, _, _)
放在then
节和文本案例中可以正常工作。 所以最终的代码是:
@SpringBean
private S3Service s3service = Mock()
def "failed to upload article into s3"() {
given: "mock the s3 service to throw CustomRuntimeException"
// given conditions
when: "check here the with the actual beans"
// actual bean calls
then: "mention your mocks and calls"
1 * s3Service.upload(_, _, _) >> {
CompletableFuture<PutObjectResult> exception = new CompletableFuture<>();
exception.completeExceptionally(new CustomRuntimeException())
exception.exceptionally(new Function<Throwable, PutObjectResult>() {
@Override
PutObjectResult apply(Throwable throwable) {
throw new CompletionException(throwable)
}
})
}
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.