Symfony /理论中的模式

Question

# config/doctrine/schema.yml
Category:
  actAs: { Timestampable: ~ }
  columns:
    name: { type: string(255), notnull: true, unique: true }

Project:
  actAs: { Timestampable: ~ }
  columns:
    category_id:  { type: integer, notnull: true }
    title:         { type: string(255) }
    description:  { type: string(4000), notnull: true }
  relations:
    Category: { onDelete: CASCADE, local: category_id, foreign: id, foreignAlias: Projects }

这里，

如果我们改变

本地：category_id'到'外键：category_id

和

国外：ID“至”参考：ID

那么它会更有意义，还是原始版本呢？

我的意思是Symfony的创建者真的很有经验[Jonathan Wage和Fabien Potencier]，所以他们必须遵循一些我可能不知道的DB Design。

只是想知道如果有人知道为什么会这样，Symfony的方式呢？

Answer 1

遗憾的是，该文档非常丰富，同时又很少包含非常基本的部分，例如数据库架构。

AFAIK，对于给定的关系，我们具有以下结构：

"Alias":        #Name of the set of records in the other table, referenced from this table
  foreignAlias:   #Name of the set of records in this table, referenced from the other table
  type:           #multiplicity of the records in the other table; can be "one" or "many"
  foreignType:    #multiplicity of the records in this table; can be "one" or "many"
  local:          #field of this table that references records of the other table
                  #for a many to many relation, field of the middle table that references records of this table
  class:          #class of the other table; identifies referenced records
  foreign:        #field of the other table; identifies referenced records
                  #for a many to many relation, field of the middle table that references records of the other table
  refClass:       #for a many to many relation, class of the middle table
  onDelete:       #database level referential integrity, only on the table that owns the foreign key
  onUpdate:       #database level referential integrity, only on the table that owns the foreign key
  cascade:        #application level cascade
  foreignKeyName: #name of the constraint for the foreign key

IMO，可能会更简单，更直观。