在C＃中安全地处理Excel互操作对象？

Question

我正在开发一个winforms c＃visual studio 2008应用程序。 该应用程序与excel文件对话，我正在使用Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel; 去做这个。

我想知道即使出现错误，如何确保释放对象？

这是我的代码：

private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    string myBigFile="";
    OpenFileDialog openFileDialog1 = new OpenFileDialog();
    DialogResult result = openFileDialog1.ShowDialog(); // Show the dialog.
    if (result == DialogResult.OK) // Test result.
        myBigFile=openFileDialog1.FileName;

    Excel.Application xlApp;
    Excel.Workbook xlWorkBook;
    Excel.Worksheet xlWorkSheet;
    Excel.Range range;

    string str;
    int rCnt = 0;
    int cCnt = 0;

    xlApp = new Excel.ApplicationClass();
    xlWorkBook = xlApp.Workbooks.Open(myBigFile, 0, true, 5, "", "", true, Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.XlPlatform.xlWindows, "\t", true, false, 0, true, 1, 0);
    xlWorkSheet = (Excel.Worksheet)xlWorkBook.Worksheets.get_Item(1);

    range = xlWorkSheet.UsedRange;

    /*
    for (rCnt = 1; rCnt <= range.Rows.Count; rCnt++)
    {
        for (cCnt = 1; cCnt <= range.Columns.Count; cCnt++)
        {
            str = (string)(range.Cells[rCnt, cCnt] as Excel.Range).Value2;
            MessageBox.Show(str);
        }
    }
     */
    xlWorkSheet..EntireRow.Delete(Excel.XLDirection.xlUp)

    xlWorkBook.SaveAs(xlWorkBook.Path + @"\XMLCopy.xls",         Excel.XlFileFormat.xlXMLSpreadsheet, Type.Missing, Type.Missing,
   false, false, Excel.XlSaveAsAccessMode.xlNoChange,
   Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing);

    xlWorkBook.Close(true, null, null);
    xlApp.Quit();

    releaseObject(xlWorkSheet);
    releaseObject(xlWorkBook);
    releaseObject(xlApp);
}

private void releaseObject(object obj)
{
    try
    {
        System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject(obj);
        obj = null;
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        obj = null;
        MessageBox.Show("Unable to release the Object " + ex.ToString());
    }
    finally
    {
        GC.Collect();
    }
}

我怎么能确保即使我在工作簿打开后得到一个错误，我确保处理对象：

Excel.Application xlApp;
Excel.Workbook xlWorkBook;
Excel.Worksheet xlWorkSheet;
Excel.Range range;

换句话说，无论我需要以下几行来运行

xlWorkBook.Close(true, null, null);
xlApp.Quit();

releaseObject(xlWorkSheet);
releaseObject(xlWorkBook);
releaseObject(xlApp);

请注意，我也试过这个，导致同样的问题

xlWorkBook.Close(false, System.Reflection.Missing.Value, System.Reflection.Missing.Value);


                xlApp.Quit();

                Marshal.ReleaseComObject(xlWorkSheet);
                Marshal.ReleaseComObject(xlWorkBook);
                Marshal.ReleaseComObject(xlApp);

                xlWorkSheet = null;
                xlWorkBook = null;
                xlApp = null;

                GC.GetTotalMemory(false);
                GC.Collect();
                GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
                GC.Collect();
                GC.GetTotalMemory(true);  

我也是这样做的：

GC.Collect()                   ;
                GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
                GC.Collect()                  ; 
                GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();

                Marshal.FinalReleaseComObject(xlWorkSheet);

                xlWorkBook.Close(Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing);
                Marshal.FinalReleaseComObject(xlWorkBook); 

                xlApp.Quit();
                Marshal.FinalReleaseComObject(xlApp); 

在这一点上我不认为有可能从Visual Studio 2008关闭excel。它必须是一个bug或者什么，但我已经尝试了前20个网站并得到相同的结果：excel因某种原因打开了两个实例当我做垃圾收集等..（或不）它只关闭一个实例。

当我尝试打开文件时，它表示存在错误或已损坏。

当我去任务管理器并杀死excel进程时，文件将打开没有问题。]

有没有办法用visual studio 2008关闭excel？ 如果是的话，请你为我提供指导或解决方案

Answer 1

首先，我将介绍一个修改过的releaseObject ，然后我将提供一个模式来使用它。

using Marshal = System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal;
private void releaseObject(ref object obj) // note ref!
{
    // Do not catch an exception from this.
    // You may want to remove these guards depending on
    // what you think the semantics should be.
    if (obj != null && Marshal.IsComObject(obj)) {
        Marshal.ReleaseComObject(obj);
    }
    // Since passed "by ref" this assingment will be useful
    // (It was not useful in the original, and neither was the
    //  GC.Collect.)
    obj = null;
}

现在，使用的模式：

private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    // Declare. Assign a value to avoid a compiler error.
    Excel.Application xlApp = null;
    Excel.Workbook xlWorkBook = null;
    Excel.Worksheet xlWorkSheet = null;

    try {
        // Initialize
        xlApp = new Excel.ApplicationClass();
        xlWorkBook = xlApp.Workbooks.Open(myBigFile, 0, true, 5, "", "", true, Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.XlPlatform.xlWindows, "\t", true, false, 0, true, 1, 0);
        // If the cast fails this like could "leak" a COM RCW
        // Since this "should never happen" I wouldn't worry about it.
        xlWorkSheet = (Excel.Worksheet)xlWorkBook.Worksheets.get_Item(1);
        ...
    } finally {
        // Release all COM RCWs.
        // The "releaseObject" will just "do nothing" if null is passed,
        // so no need to check to find out which need to be released.
        // The "finally" is run in all cases, even if there was an exception
        // in the "try". 
        // Note: passing "by ref" so afterwords "xlWorkSheet" will
        // evaluate to null. See "releaseObject".
        releaseObject(ref xlWorkSheet);
        releaseObject(ref xlWorkBook);
        // The Quit is done in the finally because we always
        // want to quit. It is no different than releasing RCWs.
        if (xlApp != null) {
            xlApp.Quit();
        }
        releaseObject(ref xlApp);    
    }
}

在大多数情况下，可以扩展/嵌套这种简单的方法。 我使用实现IDisposable的自定义包装器类来简化此任务。

Answer 2

验证您在代码中看到的两个问题：

• 当程序关闭时，Excel仍然是一个正在运行的进程
• 当您打开Excel程序创建的Excel文件时，您会在Excel中看到错误，说文件已损坏或其他类似文件

我将编辑过的问题中的button1单击处理程序和pst的releaseObject方法复制到一个干净的VS2008，C＃3.5 Winform应用程序中，并进行了一些小的更改，以消除上面列出的问题。

要修复Excel不从内存中卸载，请在您创建的range对象上调用releaseObject 。 在调用releaseObject(xlWorkSheet);之前执行此操作releaseObject(xlWorkSheet); 记住所有这些参考资料是COM Interop编程非常有趣的原因。

要修复损坏的Excel文件的问题更新WorkBook.SaveAs方法调用替换第二个参数（ Excel.XlFileFormat.xlXMLSpreadsheet含） Type.Missing 。 默认情况下， SaveAs方法将正确处理此问题。

我确信您在问题中发布的代码已经过简化，以帮助调试您遇到的问题。 你应该使用try..finally块pst演示。