繁体   English   中英

是否可以在IO以外的monad中使用带有测试框架的HUnit?

[英]Is it possible to use HUnit with test-framework in a monad other than IO?

我目前有以下测试代码:

testUpdate :: Test
testUpdate = testCase "update does change artist" $ do
  (created, Just revised, parents) <- mbTest $ do
    Just editor <- fmap entityRef <$> findEditorByName "acid2"

    created <- create editor startWith
    let artistId = coreMbid created

    newRev <- update editor (coreRevision created) expected

    editId <- openEdit
    includeRevision editId newRev
    apply editId

    found <- findLatest artistId
    parents <- revisionParents newRev

    return (created, found, parents)

  coreData revised @?= expected

  assertBool "The old revision is a direct parent of the new revision" $
    parents == [coreRevision created]

  where
    startWith = ...
    expected = ...

这种方式有效,但它很混乱。 我宁愿能够写一些东西而不必返回被测试的各种东西,而是在它们有意义的地方有断言。

我看到有Assertable类,但似乎我可能不得不最终重新发明一堆东西。

为什么不让你的monad返回类型IO a的IO计算,这是一个值? 因为在你的评论中,monad是MonadIO实例的情况很简单,假设monad允许纯计算:

newtype M a = M {runM :: ....}
instance Monad M where
  ...

makeTest :: M Assertion
makeTest = do
    created <- ..
    found   <- ..
    parents <- ..
    let test1 = coreData revised @?= expected
    ...
    let test2 = assertBool "The old revision..." $
                   parents == [coreRevision create]

    return $ test1 >> test2

testUpdate :: Test
testUpdate = testCase "update does change artist" $ runM makeTest

奖励是您可以通过一个monadic计算返回一组测试,就像在monad列表中一样。

暂无
暂无

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM