簡體   English   中英

使用ContentObserver調用了兩次同步適配器

[英]Sync Adapter called twice using ContentObserver

因此,我一直遇到這樣的問題:在我顯式調用requestSync時首先調用onPerformSync,然后在30或60秒(但主要是60秒)之后調用它,這很奇怪。 我正在使用ContentObserver,並且僅當我使用ContentObserver時才會發生此行為。 我嘗試直接從我的內容提供者調用requestSync,並且沒有觸發其他onPerformSync。 我的代碼摘錄如下。

提供者調用notifyChange

@Nullable
@Override
public Uri insert(@NonNull Uri uri, ContentValues values) {
    Log.d(LOG_TAG, "Inserting with uri " + uri + " with values " + values.toString());
    SQLiteDatabase db = mOpenHelper.getWritableDatabase();
    int match = sUriMatcher.match(uri);

    ....

    // This direct requestSync call does not trigger extra syncs
    //Bundle extras = new Bundle();
    //extras.putString(SyncAdapter.CHANGED_URI, uri.toString());
    //getContext().getContentResolver().requestSync(SyncAccount.getAccount(), Contract.CONTENT_AUTHORITY, extras);

    getContext().getContentResolver().notifyChange(contentUri, null);

    return contentUri;
}

具有onChange的ContentObserver

public class TableObserver extends ContentObserver {

    private final static String LOG_TAG = TableObserver.class.getSimpleName();

    private final Account mAccount;

    public TableObserver(Handler handler, Account account) {
        super(handler);

        mAccount = account;
    }

    @Override
    public void onChange(boolean selfChange) {
        super.onChange(selfChange, null);
    }

    @Override
    public void onChange(boolean selfChange, Uri uri) {
        Log.d(LOG_TAG, "Provider changed here: " + uri.toString());
        Bundle args = new Bundle();
        args.putString(SyncAdapter.CHANGED_URI, uri.toString());

       ContentResolver.requestSync(mAccount,  Contract.CONTENT_AUTHORITY, args);
    }
}

帶有onPerformSync的同步適配器

public class SyncAdapter extends AbstractThreadedSyncAdapter {

    private static final String LOG_TAG = SyncAdapter.class.getSimpleName();

    public static final String CHANGED_URI = "changed_uri";

    private ContentResolver mContentResolver;

    public SyncAdapter(Context context, boolean autoInitialize) {
        super(context, autoInitialize);

        mContentResolver = context.getContentResolver();
    }

    public SyncAdapter(Context context, boolean autoInitialize, boolean allowParallelSyncs) {
        super(context, autoInitialize, allowParallelSyncs);

        mContentResolver = context.getContentResolver();
    }

    // This is automatically performed in a background thread.
    @Override
    public void onPerformSync(Account account, Bundle extras, String authority, ContentProviderClient provider, SyncResult syncResult) {
        Log.d(LOG_TAG, "Synchronizing: " + extras.get(CHANGED_URI));
    }
}

通過將false傳遞給notifyChange來修復它,該方法確實刪除了該方法與網絡行為的同步,如下所示:

getContext().getContentResolver().notifyChange(contentUri, null, false);

暫無
暫無

聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粵ICP備18138465號  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM