[英]How to implement tuple unpacking for function parameters in Java?
我創建了一些tuple
類,並將它們放入Java集合中。 但是我不想在迭代集合時直接使用tuple
作為函數參數。所以我實現了元組解包,如下面的代碼。
基本上它可以工作,但問題是需要進行類型轉換:
map((Func2<Long, Long, Long>) (a, b) -> a + b)
有沒有辦法在這里刪除類型轉換?
編輯:
也許我沒有說清楚,不僅是tuple2
,還有tuple3
, tuple4
......應該得到支持。 Tuple2
的答案對Tuple2
很大Tuple2
,但在此期間對tuple2
, tuple3
, tuple4
package test;
import com.google.common.collect.Iterables;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.function.Function;
import static test.TupleIterable.Tuple.tuple;
public interface TupleIterable<T> {
Iterable<T> apply();
static <E> TupleIterable<E> from(Iterable<E> iterable) {
return () -> iterable;
}
default <E> TupleIterable<E> map(Function<? super T, ? extends E> op) {
return () -> Iterables.transform(TupleIterable.this.apply(), op::apply);
}
interface Func2<T1, T2, R> extends Function<Tuple.Tuple2<T1, T2>, R> {
R apply(T1 t1, T2 t2);
@Override
default R apply(Tuple.Tuple2<T1, T2> t) {
return apply(t.t1, t.t2);
}
}
interface Func3<T1, T2, T3, R> extends Function<Tuple.Tuple3<T1, T2, T3>, R> {
R apply(T1 t1, T2 t2, T3 t3);
@Override
default R apply(Tuple.Tuple3<T1, T2, T3> t) {
return apply(t.t1, t.t2, t.t3);
}
}
interface Tuple {
static <T1, T2> Tuple2<T1, T2> tuple(T1 t1, T2 t2) {
return new Tuple2<>(t1, t2);
}
static <T1, T2, T3> Tuple3<T1, T2, T3> tuple(T1 t1, T2 t2, T3 t3) {
return new Tuple3<>(t1, t2, t3);
}
class Tuple2<T1, T2> implements Tuple {
public T1 t1;
public T2 t2;
public Tuple2(T1 t1, T2 t2) {
this.t1 = t1;
this.t2 = t2;
}
}
class Tuple3<T1, T2, T3> implements Tuple {
public T1 t1;
public T2 t2;
public T3 t3;
public Tuple3(T1 t1, T2 t2, T3 t3) {
this.t1 = t1;
this.t2 = t2;
this.t3 = t3;
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
TupleIterable.from(Arrays.asList(1L, 2L))
.map(x -> tuple(x, x)) // map long to tuple2
.map((Func2<Long, Long, Tuple.Tuple3<Long, Long, Long>>) (a, b) -> tuple(a, b, a + b)) // map tuple2 to tuple3
.map((Func3<Long, Long, Long, Long>) (a, b, c) -> a + b + c) // map tuple3 to Long
.apply()
.forEach(System.out::println);
}
}
你可以像JDK開發人員那樣為原始類型的Stream
化做同樣的技巧。 介紹mapToTuple
並在不同的接口中unwrap
。
我重寫了一些代碼並使用了一些現有的FunctionalInterfaces
。
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.function.BiFunction;
import java.util.function.Function;
import java.util.function.Supplier;
public class Test {
public static void main(String... args) {
MyIterable.from(Arrays.asList(1L, 2L)).mapToTuple(l -> Tuple2.tuple(l, l + 1L)).unwrap((a, b) -> a + b).get()
.forEach(System.out::println);
}
}
final class Tuple2<T1, T2> {
public static <T1, T2> Tuple2<T1, T2> tuple(T1 t1, T2 t2) {
return new Tuple2<>(t1, t2);
}
public final T1 t1;
public final T2 t2;
private Tuple2(T1 t1, T2 t2) {
this.t1 = t1;
this.t2 = t2;
}
}
@FunctionalInterface
interface TupleIterable<T1, T2> extends Supplier<Iterable<Tuple2<T1, T2>>> {
default <E> MyIterable<E> unwrap(BiFunction<T1, T2, E> func) {
return () -> Iterables.transform(get(), t -> func.apply(t.t1, t.t2));
}
}
@FunctionalInterface
interface MyIterable<T> extends Supplier<Iterable<T>> {
static <E> MyIterable<E> from(Iterable<E> iterable) {
return () -> iterable;
}
default <E> MyIterable<E> map(Function<? super T, ? extends E> mapper) {
return () -> Iterables.transform(get(), mapper::apply);
}
default <T1, T2> TupleIterable<T1, T2> mapToTuple(Function<? super T, ? extends Tuple2<T1, T2>> tupleMapper) {
return () -> Iterables.transform(get(), tupleMapper::apply);
}
}
final class Iterables {
public static <T, E> Iterable<E> transform(Iterable<T> iterable, Function<? super T, ? extends E> mapper) {
return () -> new Iterator<E>() {
private final Iterator<T> iter = iterable.iterator();
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return iter.hasNext();
}
@Override
public E next() {
return mapper.apply(iter.next());
}
};
}
}
我沒有進行類型轉換,而是創建了一個unpack
函數來解包元組。 它的工作方式類似於map(unpack((a, b) -> tuple(a, b, a + b)))
,但仍然不夠直觀。
package test;
import com.google.common.collect.Iterables;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.function.Function;
import static test.TupleIterable.Func.unpack;
import static test.TupleIterable.Tuple.tuple;
public interface TupleIterable<T> {
Iterable<T> apply();
static <E> TupleIterable<E> from(Iterable<E> iterable) {
return () -> iterable;
}
default <E> TupleIterable<E> map(Function<? super T, E> op) {
return () -> Iterables.transform(TupleIterable.this.apply(), op::apply);
}
interface Func {
static <T1, T2, R> Function<Tuple.Tuple2<T1, T2>, R> unpack(Func2<T1, T2, R> f) {
return t -> f.apply(t.t1, t.t2);
}
static <T1, T2, T3, R> Function<Tuple.Tuple3<T1, T2, T3>, R> unpack(Func3<T1, T2, T3, R> f) {
return t -> f.apply(t.t1, t.t2, t.t3);
}
@FunctionalInterface
interface Func2<T1, T2, R> {
R apply(T1 t1, T2 t2);
}
@FunctionalInterface
interface Func3<T1, T2, T3, R> {
R apply(T1 t1, T2 t2, T3 t3);
}
}
interface Tuple {
static <T1, T2> Tuple2<T1, T2> tuple(T1 t1, T2 t2) {
return new Tuple2<>(t1, t2);
}
static <T1, T2, T3> Tuple3<T1, T2, T3> tuple(T1 t1, T2 t2, T3 t3) {
return new Tuple3<>(t1, t2, t3);
}
class Tuple2<T1, T2> implements Tuple {
public T1 t1;
public T2 t2;
public Tuple2(T1 t1, T2 t2) {
this.t1 = t1;
this.t2 = t2;
}
}
class Tuple3<T1, T2, T3> implements Tuple {
public T1 t1;
public T2 t2;
public T3 t3;
public Tuple3(T1 t1, T2 t2, T3 t3) {
this.t1 = t1;
this.t2 = t2;
this.t3 = t3;
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
TupleIterable.from(Arrays.asList(1L, 2L))
.map(x -> tuple(x, x)) // map long to tuple2
.map(unpack((a, b) -> tuple(a, b, a + b))) // map tuple2 to tuple3
.map(unpack((a, b, c) -> a + b + c)) // map tuple3 to Long
.apply()
.forEach(System.out::println);
}
}
我無法確定這是否太“臟”,但為什么不在Tuple2
為T1
和T2
提供getter並執行:
.map(x -> tuple(x, x + 1)) // map long to tuple2
.map(a -> a.getT1() + a.getT2()) // map tuple2 to long
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.