簡體   English   中英

將左值分配給右值引用時會發生什么? 沒有破壞臨時對象?

[英]What happen when a lvalue assigned to a rvalue reference? No destruction of the temporary object?

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
#include <cstring>

class Word{
    private:
        char* ptr = nullptr;
    public:
        Word(){
            cout << "default constructor" << endl;
        }
        Word(const char* sentence):ptr{new char [strlen(sentence)+1]}{
            strcpy(ptr, sentence);
            cout << "conversion constructor: " << ptr << endl;
        }
        Word(const Word& w):ptr{new char [strlen(w.ptr)+1]}{
            strcpy(ptr, w.ptr);
            cout << "copy constructor: "<< ptr << endl;
        }
        ~Word(){
            cout << "destructor: " << ptr << endl;
        }
};

int main(){
    Word a ("A stands for apple!");
    Word&& b = "B stands for Banana, rvalue ref";
    b = a;
}

我的Eclipse結果:

conversion constructor: A stands for apple!
conversion constructor: B stands for Banana, rvalue ref
destructor: A stands for apple!
destructor: A stands for apple!

我的延伸:

conversion constructor: A stands for apple!
conversion constructor: B stands for Banana, rvalue ref
destructor: B stands for Banana, rvalue ref
destructor: A stands for apple!
destructor: A stands for apple!

我對這一步感到困惑。

b = a;

將a分配給b時,可以假設首先銷毀b持有的臨時對象(cstring為“ B代表Banana,rvalue ref”),然后將a的值分配給b。 為什么在Eclipse的結果中,它不執行對臨時對象的銷毀?

您的期望是錯誤的。 破壞不可能超過建築。

將a分配給b時,它可能會假設首先破壞臨時對象

b號指的是臨時對象。 分配給對象不會導致對象被破壞。

發生的事情是: Word隱式生成的賦值運算符將分配所有成員。 因此,分配后的前值b.ptr被泄露,並具有相同的值(指向相同的字符串)作為a.ptr

b = a; 正在調用賦值運算符,而不是副本構造函數。 如果明確刪除,則代碼將無法編譯:

// trimmed...
Word(const Word& w):ptr{new char [strlen(w.ptr)+1]}{
    strcpy(ptr, w.ptr);
    cout << "copy constructor: "<< ptr << endl;
}
Word& operator = (const Word& w) = delete;

編譯行:

$ g++ rvalue-ref.cpp -o rvalue-ref
rvalue-ref.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
rvalue-ref.cpp:45:9: error: use of deleted function ‘Word& Word::operator=(const Word&)’
     b = a;
         ^
rvalue-ref.cpp:20:15: note: declared here
         Word& operator = (const Word& w) = delete;
               ^~~~~~~~

編譯器將提供一個默認的賦值運算符,因此您問題中的代碼就是利用它。 要查看正在發生的情況,請添加復制分配和移動分配運算符。

Word& operator = (const Word& w) {
    auto temp = new char [strlen(w.ptr)+1];
    strcpy(temp, w.ptr);
    delete [] ptr;
    ptr = temp;
    cout << "assignment operator: " << ptr << endl;
    return *this;
}
Word& operator = (Word&& w) {
    std::swap(ptr, w.ptr);
    cout << "swap operator: " << ptr << endl;
    return *this;
}

有了這些,我得到了預期的輸出:

conversion constructor: A stands for apple!
conversion constructor: B stands for Banana, rvalue ref
assignment operator: A stands for apple!
destructor: A stands for apple!
destructor: A stands for apple!

順便說一句,您正在泄漏內存。 您的析構函數應如下所示:

~Word(){
    cout << "destructor: " << ptr << endl;
    delete [] ptr;
}

$ valgrind ./rvalue-ref

==10736== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==10736== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==10736== Using Valgrind-3.13.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==10736== Command: ./rvalue-ref
==10736== 
conversion constructor: A stands for apple!
conversion constructor: B stands for Banana, rvalue ref
assignment operator: A stands for apple!
destructor: A stands for apple!
destructor: A stands for apple!
==10736== 
==10736== HEAP SUMMARY:
==10736==     in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==10736==   total heap usage: 5 allocs, 5 frees, 73,800 bytes allocated
==10736== 
==10736== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==10736== 
==10736== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==10736== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)

您還可以使用復制/交換慣用語(如下)實現賦值運算符。 由於臨時原因,這將添加一個額外的構造函數/析構函數輸出,但這是一個好的做法。

Word& operator = (const Word& w) {
    Word temp(w);
    std::swap(ptr, temp.ptr);
    cout << "assignment operator: " << ptr << endl;
    return *this;
}

暫無
暫無

聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粵ICP備18138465號  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM