[英]Why don't discriminated unions in typescript work in this way?
為什么打字稿不能基於這樣的共同屬性進行區分? 閱讀文檔后,我認為這會起作用。
這是打字稿游樂場
type Mammal = { legs: number }
type Fish = { fins: number }
type Action1 = {
type: 'a',
payload: Mammal
}
type Action2 = {
type: 'b',
payload: Fish
}
type ActionUnion = Action1 | Action2
const A: Action1 = { type: 'a', payload: { legs: 4 } }
const B: Action2 = { type: 'b', payload: { fins: 3 } }
function foo(action: ActionUnion) {
switch (action.type) {
case 'a':
const { legs } = action.payload
case 'b':
const { fins } = action.payload
default:
break
}
}
你忘了打破你的案情陳述。 應該看起來像這樣
case 'a':
const { legs } = action.payload
break;
case 'b':
const { fins } = action.payload
它們確實可以那樣工作,但是您的開關盒陷入了下一個情況,請添加一個break
,這樣就可以了
type Mammal = { legs: number }
type Fish = { fins: number }
type Action1 = {
type: 'a',
payload: Mammal
}
type Action2 = {
type: 'b',
payload: Fish
}
type ActionUnion = Action1 | Action2
const A: Action1 = { type: 'a', payload: { legs: 4 } }
const B: Action2 = { type: 'b', payload: { fins: 3 } }
function foo(action: ActionUnion) {
switch (action.type) {
case 'a':
const { legs } = action.payload
break;
case 'b':
const { fins } = action.payload
break;
default:
break
}
}
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.