[英]How to Unit Test a Lambda Implemented with AWS SDK for Go V2
給定以下簡單的 lambda 寫在 Go 中,它只返回一個表描述......
package main
import (
"context"
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"log"
"net/http"
"os"
"strings"
"github.com/aws/aws-lambda-go/events"
"github.com/aws/aws-lambda-go/lambda"
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws"
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/config"
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodb"
"go.uber.org/zap"
)
var (
dynamoDBTableName = aws.String(os.Getenv(EnvDynamoDBTableName))
logger = func() *zap.Logger {
l, err := zap.NewProduction()
if err != nil {
log.Printf("failed to create zap logger: %v", err)
}
return l
}()
)
func handler(ctx context.Context, req events.APIGatewayProxyRequest)
(events.APIGatewayProxyResponse, error) {
defer logger.Sync()
resp := events.APIGatewayProxyResponse{}
cfg, err := config.LoadDefaultConfig(ctx)
if err != nil {
logger.Error("failed to load AWS config", zap.Error(err))
return resp, fmt.Errorf("failed to load AWS config: %w", err)
}
svc := dynamodb.NewFromConfig(cfg)
// fake logic
t, err := svc.DescribeTable(ctx, &dynamodb.DescribeTableInput{TableName: dynamoDBTableName})
if err != nil {
logger.Error("failed to describe table", zap.String("table-name", *dynamoDBTableName), zap.Error(err))
}
var sb strings.Builder
enc := json.NewEncoder(&sb)
err = enc.Encode(t.Table)
if err != nil {
logger.Error("failed to JSON encode response", zap.Error(err))
}
resp.Body = sb.String()
resp.StatusCode = http.StatusOK
return resp, nil
}
func main() {
lambda.Start(handler)
}
...我如何在本地對其進行單元測試? 使用舊的 SDK 可以像這樣使用依賴注入:
type deps struct
svc dynamodbiface.DynamoDBAPI
table string
}
func (d *deps) handler(ctx context.Context, req events.APIGatewayProxyRequest)
(events.APIGatewayProxyResponse, error) {
...
}
func main() {
s := session.Must(session.NewSession())
d := deps {
svc: dynamodb.New(s),
table: dynamoDBTableName,
}
lambda.Start(d.handler)
}
鑒於我需要上下文來加載 dynamodb.NewFromConfig 所需的配置,我如何測試使用新 AWS SDK 為 Go V2 編寫的dynamodb.NewFromConfig
?
首先讓你的處理程序成為一個不起眼的 object,這樣我們就可以“跳過”測試它:
func handler(ctx context.Context, req events.APIGatewayProxyRequest)
(events.APIGatewayProxyResponse, error) {
dynamoWrapper := &RealDynamoWrapper{}
proxyController := &ProxyController{DynamoWrapper: dynamoWrapper}
return proxyController.proxy(ctx, req)
這個想法是通過將所有復雜性委托給proxyController
來使處理程序 function 變得謙虛。
現在,讓我們考慮要測試的ProxyController
,我們需要先定義它:
type ProxyController struct {
dynamoWrapper DynamoWrapper
}
func(controller *ProxyController) Proxy(ctx context.Context, req events.APIGatewayProxyRequest) (events.APIGatewayProxyResponse, error) {
// this is where your implementation lives that you need to mock stuff for
// We are mocking this line from your question
svc := controller.dynamoWrapper.NewFromConfig(...)
// do other stuff and then return something
return events.APIGatewayProxyResponse{}, nil
}
你可以看到我將依賴於 dynamo 的包裝版本,它看起來像這樣:
type DynamoWrapper interface {
NewFromConfig(cfg aws.Config, optFns ...func(*Options)) *Client
}
現在這個包裝器的真正實現,上面提到的RealDynamoWrapper
將像您對 sdk 一樣進行調用。不過對於我們的測試,我們需要一個模擬實現:
type mockDynamoWrapper struct {
NewFromConfigFunc func(aws.Config, ...func(*Options)) *Client
}
func(dynamoWrapper *mockDynamoWrapper) NewFromConfig(cfg aws.Config, optFns ...func(*Options)) *Client {
return dynamoWrapper.NewFromConfigFunc(cfg, optFns...)
}
最后,在您的測試中,您現在可以模擬 dynamo 調用:
func TestProxyController(t *testing.T) {
// given
dynamoWrapper := &mockDynamoWrapper{}
proxyController := &ProxyController{DynamoWrapper: mockDynamoWrapper}
request := events.APIGatewayProxyRequest{}
dynamoWrapper.NewFromConfigFunc = func(aws.Config, ...func(*Options)) *Client {
// setup your mock function to do whatever you want
}
// when
proxyController.proxy(context.Background, request)
// then do your asserts
}
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.