[英]How can I handle Nothing branch of maybe monad gracefully?
data Union = F Float | I Int | S String
getUnionFromString :: String -> Union
getUnionFromString str =
case (readMaybe str :: Maybe Int) of
Just i -> I i
Nothing ->
case (readMaybe str :: Maybe Float) of
Just f -> F f
Nothing -> S str
getStr (F f) = "Float " ++ show f
getStr (I i) = "Int " ++ show i
getStr (S s) = "String " ++ s
main = do
str <- getLine
putStrLn $ getStr (getUnionFromString str)
我想制作一個將字符串轉換為聯合類型(Float | Int | String)的函數。 所以我使用readMaybe
來找出字符串的類型。 然后,使用 case-of 來處理Just
and Nothing
分支。 我認為它無法用Maybe
的Monad
行為來應對這種情況,因為我不想在Nothing
出來時停止計算,我想處理Nothing
情況。 有沒有更好的方法來編寫getUnionFromString
函數?
如果計算結果為Nothing
,我們可以使用Control.Applicative.<|>
來簡化嘗試不同表達式的邏輯:
Prelude> import Control.Applicative
Prelude Control.Applicative> Just 1 <|> Nothing
Just 1
Prelude Control.Applicative> Just 1 <|> Just 2
Just 1
Prelude Control.Applicative> Nothing <|> Just 1
Just 1
Prelude Control.Applicative> Nothing <|> Nothing
Nothing
將它與Data.Maybe.fromMaybe
一起使用,我們可以將代碼簡化為:
getUnionFromString :: String -> Union
getUnionFromString str = fromMaybe (S str) $ (I <$> readMaybe str) <|> (F <$> readMaybe str)
Haskell 的類型推斷能夠計算出第一個readMaybe
想要一個Maybe Int
而第二個想要Maybe Float
,而無需我們明確要求它。
完整代碼:
import Control.Applicative
import Data.Maybe (fromMaybe)
import Text.Read
data Union = F Float | I Int | S String
getUnionFromString :: String -> Union
getUnionFromString str = fromMaybe (S str) $ (I <$> readMaybe str) <|> (F <$> readMaybe str)
getStr (F f) = "Float " ++ show f
getStr (I i) = "Int " ++ show i
getStr (S s) = "String " ++ s
main = do
str <- getLine
putStrLn $ getStr (getUnionFromString str)
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.