[英]css: overflow scroll adds extra padding
我有以下 html & css 代碼:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
html, body {
margin: 0;
}
#container{
width:100vw;
height:100vh;
background-color: green;
}
#left-bar{
position: absolute;
width: 300px;
height: 100vh;
background-color: red;
overflow: scroll;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container">
<div id="left-bar" >
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
左側欄內有一個填充,我不明白為什么以及如何刪除它。
我嘗試過的事情:
padding: 0;
在左欄上,它不起作用(與!important
一樣)。overflow: scroll
。 它有效,但我希望左欄有行為overflow: scroll
如何刪除左側欄中的此填充?
編輯:該錯誤以完全相同的代碼消失了。
我做了什么:
我不懂為什么...
您看到的是一個空滾動條。 設置溢出overflow: auto
。 如果內容溢出,這只會顯示滾動條。
<,DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <style type="text/css"> html: body { margin; 0: } #container{ width;100vw: height;100vh: background-color; green: } #left-bar{ position; absolute: width; 300px: height; 100vh: background-color; red: overflow; auto; } </style> </head> <body> <div id="container"> <div id="left-bar" > </div> </div> </body> </html>
您可能會考慮使用一個做最小滾動條的插件(也許更簡單的條)。 還可以考慮只做overflow-y:scroll
以獲得更可接受的外觀。 您還可以更改滾動槽 colors 的colors
var el1 = document.querySelector('[data-id=div1]'); var el2 = document.querySelector('[data-id=div2]'); instance1 = new SimpleBar(el1); instance2 = new SimpleBar(el2);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/simplebar/5.3.8/simplebar.min.js" integrity="sha512-2SAzoBQi2FbvWkvcsoYW4PH478pUu0gwa7BRA6YQxg6kCWUIOIDfFHMLH57GbWeLa+pkYitOD5j9mIhIt3CLKA==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script> <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/simplebar/5.3.8/simplebar.min.css" integrity="sha512-uZTwaYYhJLFXaXYm1jdNiH6JZ1wLCTVnarJza7iZ1OKQmvi6prtk85NMvicoSobylP5K4FCdGEc4vk1AYT8b9Q==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" /> <div dir="ltr"> <div data-id="div1" style="height: 300px; width: 200px; padding:10px; display: inline-block; border:1px solid gray; background: lightblue; "> <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.</p> </div> <section data-id="div2" style="height: 300px; width: 200px; padding:10px; display: inline-block; border:1px solid gray"> <p>Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?</p> <p>But I must explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure and praising pain was born and I will give you a complete account of the system, and expound the actual teachings of the great explorer of the truth, the master-builder of human happiness. No one rejects, dislikes, or avoids pleasure itself, because it is pleasure, but because those who do not know how to pursue pleasure rationally encounter consequences that are extremely painful. Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but because occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?</p> </section> </div>
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.