[英]Explicitly passing a const object to an constructor which takes const reference to a polymorphic class
我遇到了類問題,將const對象(多態結構)傳遞給顯式構造函數,該構造函數采用const引用該多態結構的基類。 這是示例(這不是來自我的代碼,在這里用於解釋)
class Base
{
...
}
class Derived:public Base
{
...
}
class Problem
{
Problem(const Base&);
...
}
void myFunction(const Problem& problem)
{
...
}
int main()
{
//explicit constructor with non const object
Derived d;
Problem no1(d); //this is working fine
myFunction(no1);
//implicit constructor with const object
Problem no2=Derived(); //this is working fine, debugged and everything called fine
myFunction(no2); //is working fine
//explicit constructor with const object NOT WORKING
Problem no3(Derived()); //debugger jumps over this line (no compiler error here)
myFunction(no3); //this line is NOT COMPILING at all it says that:
//no matching function for call to myFunction(Problem (&)(Derived))
//note: candidates are: void MyFunction(const Problem&)
}
似乎只有在我將Derived對象顯式轉換為它的基類Base時,它才能與第二個版本(對問題的顯式構造函數調用)一起正常工作:
Problem(*(Base*)&Derived);
我沒有意識到隱式調用和顯式調用Problem類的構造函數之間的區別。 謝謝!
問題是您不是在聲明一個對象,而是一個函數:
Problem no3(Derived());
// equivalent to:
Problem no3(Derived); // with parameter name omitted
采用:
Problem no3((Derived()));
// extra parens prevent function-declaration interpretation
// which is otherwise required by the standard (so that the code isn't ambiguous)
這是C ++繼承的C聲明語法的怪癖。
更多示例:
void f(int(a)); /* same as: */ void f(int a);
void g() {
void function(int); // declare function
void function(int()); // we can declare it again
void function(int=42); // add default value
function(); // calls ::function(42) ('function' in the global scope)
}
// 'function' not available here (not declared)
void function(int) {} // definition for declarations inside g above
供以后參考,這是一個被稱為最令人討厭的語法分析的怪癖,有關此昵稱的起源,請參見另一個StackOverflow線程 。
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.