[英]Scala: Matching case classes
以下代碼聲稱傑克受雇於建築業,但簡是另一個粗暴經濟的受害者:
abstract class Person(name: String) {
case class Student(name: String, major: String) extends Person(name)
override def toString(): String = this match {
case Student(name, major) => name + " studies " + major
case Worker(name, occupation) => name + " does " + occupation
case _ => name + " is unemployed"
}
}
case class Worker(name: String, job: String) extends Person(name)
object Narrator extends Person("Jake") {
def main(args: Array[String]) {
var friend: Person = new Student("Jane", "biology")
println("My friend " + friend) //outputs "Jane is unemployed"
friend = new Worker("Jack", "construction")
println("My friend " + friend) //outputs "Jack does construction"
}
}
為什么比賽未能將Jane視為學生?
我認為這里發生的是Student
案例類是在Person
內部聲明的。 因此, case Student
的toString
將只匹配Student
S中的一個特定的一部分Person
的實例。
如果你將case class Student
移動到case class Worker
並行(然后從object Narrator
刪除不必要的extends Person("Jake")
......這只是為了讓new Student
成為Person$Student
具體到傑克),你會發現簡確實研究生物學。
埃米爾是完全正確的,但這是一個明確的例子:
scala> case class A(a: String) {
| case class B(b: String)
| def who(obj: Any) = obj match {
| case B(b) => println("I'm A("+a+").B("+b+").")
| case b: A#B => println("I'm B("+b+") from some A")
| case other => println("Who am I?")
| }
| }
defined class A
scala> val a1 = A("a1")
a1: A = A(a1)
scala> val a2 = A("a2")
a2: A = A(a2)
scala> val b1= a1.B("b1")
b1: a1.B = B(b1)
scala> val b2 = a2.B("b2")
b2: a2.B = B(b2)
scala> a1 who b1
I'm A(a1).B(b1).
scala> a1 who b2
I'm B(B(b2)) from some A
更確切地說,這一行:
case Student(name, major) => name + " studies " + major
真正意思
case this.Student(name, major) => name + " studies " + major
不幸的是,雖然Jane在Jake身上實例化, this
在簡的情況下,Jane指的是Jane。
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.