簡體   English   中英

為什么是boost :: variant的std :: vector導致boost語氣中的解析問題?

[英]why is std::vector of boost::variant causing parsing issues in boost spirit?

擴展這個早先的帖子 ,我想我會嘗試捕獲一個std::vector<boost::variant<double,std::string>>而不僅僅是boost::variant<double,std::string> ,但是首先使用相同的舊輸入。

這是輸出'foo'和42.7的輸出:

/tmp$ g++ -g -std=c++11 sandbox.cpp -o sandbox && ./sandbox 
<m_rule>
  <try>foo</try>
  <success></success>
  <attributes>[[f, o, o]]</attributes>
</m_rule>
<m_rule>
  <try>42.7</try>
  <success></success>
  <attributes>[42.7]</attributes>
</m_rule>
std::string='foo'
double='42.7'
/tmp$ g++ -g -std=c++11 -DDO_VECTOR sandbox.cpp -o sandbox && ./sandbox 
<m_rule>
  <try>foo</try>
  <success></success>
  <attributes>[[102, 111, 111]]</attributes>
</m_rule>
<m_rule>
  <try>42.7</try>
  <success></success>
  <attributes>[[42.7]]</attributes>
</m_rule>
double='111'
double='42.7'
/tmp$

由於某些我無法理解的原因,解析器似乎正在為'foo'生成ASCII值並導致一些混淆。

打開DO_VECTOR時是否需要更改解析器?

我應該使用不同的容器嗎?

#define BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG

#include <boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp>
#include <boost/variant.hpp>

// #define DO_VECTOR

namespace {
namespace                              qi = boost::spirit::qi;
typedef   std::string::const_iterator  Iterator;

#ifdef DO_VECTOR
typedef std::vector<boost::variant<double, std::string>>  MY_TYPE;
#else
typedef boost::variant<double, std::string>               MY_TYPE;
#endif

class my_visitor
    : public boost::static_visitor<>
{
    public:
    my_visitor( std::string& result ) : m_str( result ) { }
    void operator()( double& operand )
    {
        std::ostringstream oss;
        oss << "double='" << operand << "'";
        m_str = oss.str();
    }
    void operator()( std::string& operand )
    {
        m_str = "std::string='";
        m_str.append( operand );
        m_str.append( "'" );
    }
    std::string& m_str;
};

// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

struct variant_grammar : 
    qi::grammar<Iterator, MY_TYPE()>
{
    qi::rule<Iterator, MY_TYPE()> m_rule;

    variant_grammar() : variant_grammar::base_type(m_rule)
    {
        m_rule %= (qi::double_ | +qi::char_);

        BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG_NODE( m_rule );
    }
};

}

// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

int main()
{
    const std::string    a( "foo" ), b( "42.7" );
    variant_grammar      varGrammar;

    MY_TYPE varA, varB;
    auto begA = a.begin(), endA = a.end();
    auto begB = b.begin(), endB = b.end();
    qi::parse( begA, endA, varGrammar, varA );
    qi::parse( begB, endB, varGrammar, varB );

    if ( begA!=endA )
        std::cerr << "A FAILED TO COMPLETELY PARSE" << std::endl;
    if ( begB!=endB )
        std::cerr << "B FAILED TO COMPLETELY PARSE" << std::endl;

    std::string resultA, resultB;
    my_visitor visitor1( resultA );
    my_visitor visitor2( resultB );

#ifdef DO_VECTOR
    std::for_each( varA.begin(), varA.end(), boost::apply_visitor( visitor1 ));
    std::for_each( varB.begin(), varB.end(), boost::apply_visitor( visitor2 ));
#else
    boost::apply_visitor( visitor1, varA );
    boost::apply_visitor( visitor2, varB );
#endif

    std::cout << resultA << std::endl;
    std::cout << resultB << std::endl;

    return 0;
}

我想這會解決它:

struct variant_grammar : qi::grammar<Iterator, MY_TYPE()> {
    qi::rule<Iterator, MY_TYPE()> m_rule;
    qi::rule<Iterator, std::string()> m_string;

    variant_grammar() : variant_grammar::base_type(m_rule) {
        m_rule %= qi::double_ | m_string;
        m_string %= +qi::char_;

        BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG_NODE( m_rule );
        BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG_NODE( m_string );
    }
};

另一個解決方案是使用qi::as_string[]

struct variant_grammar : 
    qi::grammar<Iterator, MY_TYPE()>
{
    qi::rule<Iterator, MY_TYPE()> m_rule;

    variant_grammar() : variant_grammar::base_type(m_rule)
    {
        m_rule %= (qi::double_ | qi::as_string[+qi::char_]);

        BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG_NODE( m_rule );
    }
};

讓我們忘記關於雙重的一刻。 你的規則有一個std::vector<std::string>的屬性,簡化為vector<vector<char>>你的+qi::char_有一個屬性vector<char> 你想要的“foo”是vector1<vector3<char>>你得到的是vector3<vector1<char>> 這在上面的鏈接中解釋:當你遇到這樣的情況時, +qi::char為它解析的每個char調用traits::push_back_container 您可以使用輔助規則(如sharth的答案)來消除歧義,也可以使用原子解析指令之一(在本例中為qi :: as_string [])。

編輯:

以下是解決新問題的代碼:

#define BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG

#include <boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp>
#include <boost/variant.hpp>

// #define DO_VECTOR

namespace {
namespace                              qi = boost::spirit::qi;
typedef   std::string::const_iterator  Iterator;

#ifdef DO_VECTOR
typedef std::vector<boost::variant<double, std::string>>  MY_TYPE;
#else
typedef boost::variant<double, std::string>               MY_TYPE;
#endif

class my_visitor
    : public boost::static_visitor<>
{
    public:
    my_visitor( std::string& result ) : m_str( result ) { }
    void operator()( double& operand )
    {
        std::ostringstream oss;
        oss << "double='" << operand << "'";
        m_str += oss.str();
    }
    void operator()( std::string& operand )
    {
        m_str += "std::string='";
        m_str.append( operand );
        m_str.append( "'" );
    }
    std::string& m_str;
};

// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

struct variant_grammar : 
    qi::grammar<Iterator, MY_TYPE(), qi::space_type> //added a skipper to the grammar
{
    qi::rule<Iterator, MY_TYPE(), qi::space_type> m_rule; //and to the rule. It's specially important that the starting rule and your grammar have the exact same template parameters

    variant_grammar() : variant_grammar::base_type(m_rule)
    {
        m_rule %= +(qi::double_ | qi::as_string[+(qi::char_-qi::digit)]);//Limited the string parser and added a `+` in order to parse more than one element

        BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG_NODE( m_rule );
    }
};

}

// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

int main()
{
    const std::string    a( "foo 4.9 bar" ), b( "42.7" );
    variant_grammar      varGrammar;

    MY_TYPE varA, varB;
    auto begA = a.begin(), endA = a.end();
    auto begB = b.begin(), endB = b.end();
    qi::phrase_parse( begA, endA, varGrammar, qi::space, varA ); //when you have a skipper in your rule/grammar you need to use phrase_parse
    qi::phrase_parse( begB, endB, varGrammar, qi::space, varB );

    if ( begA!=endA )
        std::cerr << "A FAILED TO COMPLETELY PARSE" << std::endl;
    if ( begB!=endB )
        std::cerr << "B FAILED TO COMPLETELY PARSE" << std::endl;

    std::string resultA, resultB;
    my_visitor visitor1( resultA );
    my_visitor visitor2( resultB );

#ifdef DO_VECTOR
    std::for_each( varA.begin(), varA.end(), boost::apply_visitor( visitor1 ));
    std::for_each( varB.begin(), varB.end(), boost::apply_visitor( visitor2 ));
#else
    boost::apply_visitor( visitor1, varA );
    boost::apply_visitor( visitor2, varB );
#endif

    std::cout << resultA << std::endl;
    std::cout << resultB << std::endl;

    return 0;
}

幾個小的改動:在語法中添加了一個隊長,因此使用了phrase_parse而不是parse。 限制字符串解析器。 更改了打印機以附加到您的字符串而不是覆蓋它。

暫無
暫無

聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粵ICP備18138465號  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM