用户定义类型从引用类型到接口的隐式引用转换

Question

From C# 4.0 Spec section 6.1.6:

The implicit reference conversions are:

[...]

From any reference-type to an interface or delegate type T if it has an implicit identity or reference conversion to an interface or delegate type T0 and T0 is varience-convertible (13.1.3.2) to T.

Vladimir Reshetnikov tells us that there is an implicit reference conversion from List<string> to IEnumerable<object> . But, how can I apply this to a user defined type (is it even possible)?

I tried an implicit operator, custom derived types and a few varitions there-of...but I cannot reproduce the scenerio. I have:

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        IEnumerable<object> specialClassConversion = new List<string>();
        IEnumerable<A> userdefinedTypeConversion = new List<B>();
        A implicitConversion = new B();//varience-convertible
        IC<A> explicitConversion = (IC<A>)new D<B>();//OK, varience-convertible
        IC<A> implicitConversion2 = new D<B>();//does not compile
    }
}

class A { }

class B : A { }

interface IC<T> { }    

class D<T> 
{
    //public static implicit operator IC(D<T> m)//Error: user-defined conversions to or from an interface are not allowed
    //{
    //    return null;
    //}
}

Answer 1

If you want a user-defined class or struct to be implicitly convertible to an interface, let your class/struct implement that interface.

(Edit)

And if you want IC<B> to be implicitly convertible to IC<A> , make the IC<T> interface covariant in T by specifying the out keyword, interface IC<out T> { } . The quote from the spec you gave tells that the "composition" of these two implicit conversion is also an implicit conversion.

Source:

interface IC<out T> {  }

class D<T> : IC<T>  { }

(End edit)

Regarding the List<string> class, it implements IEnumerable<string> which in turn is convertible (implicitly) to IEnumerable<object> because IEnumerable<out T> is covariant ( out ) in T .

(One reason why they didn't allow you to make a public static implicit operator which converts to/from the interface, is that somone could write a derived class which inherited from your class and implemented the interface. That would give a "natural" conversion between their class and the interface, but the public static implicit operator would also apply, leading to two conversions (one "natural" and one "user-defined") between the types, which would be confusing and ambiguous.)