[英]Java GC strange behaviour or memory leak?
I am working on a Swing application and recently, I started to see the following problem: 我正在使用Swing应用程序,最近,我开始看到以下问题:
I have to display in a separate window a very large job report. 我必须在单独的窗口中显示非常大的工作报告。 I close this window, then I re-open the same job report and I get an OutOfMemory Java heap space error.
关闭此窗口,然后重新打开相同的作业报告,并收到OutOfMemory Java堆空间错误。
The JVM is started with -Xmx512m and all the objects that are created when I open the job report take about 300MB on heap. JVM以-Xmx512m启动,当我打开作业报告时创建的所有对象占用大约300MB的堆空间。 Assuming that there isn't a memory leak, I would expect that the second time I open the same job report the JVM won't throw the OOM.
假设没有内存泄漏,我希望第二次打开同一作业报告时,JVM不会抛出OOM。 But, looking at the GC logs after closing the first window, I don't see any GC activity.
但是,在关闭第一个窗口后查看GC日志,我看不到任何GC活动。
The strange thing is that after I close the first window, if I take a heap dump with jmap (without the "live" option) the objects can still be seen in the heap dump. 奇怪的是,在关闭第一个窗口之后,如果我使用jmap进行堆转储(不带“ live”选项),则仍然可以在堆转储中看到对象。
If I run jmap with the dump:live option, the followings happen: 如果我使用dump:live选项运行jmap,则会发生以下情况:
I tested this on Java 6 (1.6.0_25 ad 1.6.0_45, on Windows) and it reproduces all the time. 我在Java 6(在Windows上为1.6.0_25和1.6.0_45,在Windows上)中对此进行了测试,并且该代码一直在再现。
Running jmap -heap prints : 运行jmap -heap打印:
"using thread-local object allocation.
Mark Sweep Compact GC
Heap Configuration:
MinHeapFreeRatio = 40
MaxHeapFreeRatio = 70
MaxHeapSize = 536870912 (512.0MB)
NewSize = 1048576 (1.0MB)
MaxNewSize = 4294901760 (4095.9375MB)
OldSize = 4194304 (4.0MB)
NewRatio = 2
SurvivorRatio = 8
PermSize = 12582912 (12.0MB)
MaxPermSize = 134217728 (128.0MB)
"
JVM is started with the following options: JVM使用以下选项启动:
" -Xms128m
-Xmx512m
-XX:MaxPermSize=128M
-verbose:gc
-XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps
-XX:+PrintGCDetails
-Xloggc:c:\my_gc.log
-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError"
So, my question is: why are all the objects collected when I take the heap dump with the live option (a sign that there isn't a memory leak) but, if I don't do this, I am unable to re-open another(or the same) job report because I get an OOM error? 因此,我的问题是:为什么在使用live选项进行堆转储时会收集所有对象(这表明没有内存泄漏),但是,如果我不这样做,我将无法重新打开另一个(或相同)作业报告,因为我收到OOM错误?
Also, I tested another scenario: 另外,我测试了另一种情况:
Thanks in advance. 提前致谢。
So, my question is: why are all the objects collected when I take the heap dump with the live option
所以,我的问题是:为什么在使用live选项进行堆转储时,为什么要收集所有对象?
The jmap
live option forces a collection. jmap
live选项强制收集。 It has been discussed here . 这里已经讨论过了 。
Your observations corroborate that. 您的观察证实了这一点。
What can be done as an exercise is re-opening the window post some GC activity to see whether the memory has been reclaimed. 练习后可以做些什么,就是在某些GC活动之后重新打开窗口,以查看是否已回收内存。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.