[英]for_each( for_each() )?
This works, for_each passes vectors 这有效,for_each传递向量
std::vector<int> v(10, 1);
std::vector< std::vector<int> > vv(10, v);
auto vvit = vv.begin();
std::for_each(vvit, vv.end(), f);
to function f which applies for_each anew to work with inner vector ints 函数f,它适用于for_each重新使用内部向量int
void f(const std::vector<int>& v) {std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), def);}
but for_each within for_each 但for_each中的for_each
std::for_each(vvit, vv.end(), std::for_each((*vvit).begin(), (*vvit).end(), def));
and function for just ints 和整数的功能
void def(const int& i) { std::cout << i; }
does not. 才不是。 (Nor with bind, if I tried correctly.) The compiler says that the def function cannot apply the right conversion ie from vector allocator (the vector's position pointer?) to const int&, something the former example achieves with the vector-separating function f.
(如果我正确尝试的话,也没有绑定。)编译器说def函数不能应用正确的转换,即从向量分配器(向量的位置指针?)到const int&,前一个例子用向量分离函数f实现的东西。
Is this complicated or trivial? 这是复杂还是微不足道的?
Easiest solution is to pass for_each
in a lambda: 最简单的解决方案是在lambda中传递
for_each
:
std::for_each(vvit, vv.end(), [f](std::vector<int> const& v)
{ std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), f); } );
But what's wrong with 但是有什么问题
for (auto const& v : vv) {
for (int i : v) {
f(i);
}
}
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.