[英]copy algorithm vs. container constructor
What advantages if any does the copy algorithm have over using the constructor of a container directly? 与直接使用容器的构造函数相比,复制算法有什么优势?
This example is from cplusplus.com: 此示例来自cplusplus.com:
// copy algorithm example
#include <iostream> // std::cout
#include <algorithm> // std::copy
#include <vector> // std::vector
int main () {
int myints[]={10,20,30,40,50,60,70};
std::vector<int> myvector (7);
std::copy ( myints, myints+7, myvector.begin() );
std::cout << "myvector contains:";
for (std::vector<int>::iterator it = myvector.begin(); it!=myvector.end(); ++it)
std::cout << ' ' << *it;
std::cout << '\n';
return 0;
}
Why should the copy approach be preferred to 为什么应该首选复制方式
std::vector<int> myvector(myints, myints+7);
This is an example of a poor example on cplusplus.com. 这是cplusplus.com上一个较差示例的示例。 If you had such an array and were really going to copy it into a vector, you would use the constructor.
如果您有这样的数组,并且确实要将其复制到向量中,则可以使用构造函数。
std::copy
is useful in many other ways (eg if you wanted to output the array to a file or the console), but construction is not one of them. std::copy
在许多其他方式中很有用(例如,如果要将阵列输出到文件或控制台),但构造方法不是其中之一。
Well, firstly, since you are using C++11: 好吧,首先,由于您使用的是C ++ 11:
int myints[]={10,20,30,40,50,60,70};
std::vector<int> myvector(myints, myints+7);
for (std::vector<int>::iterator it = myvector.begin(); it!=myvector.end(); ++it)
std::cout << ' ' << *it;
could actually be written the following way: 实际上可以通过以下方式编写:
std::vector<int> myVector = {10,20,30,40,50,60,70};
for (const int i : myVector )
std::cout << ' ' << i;
Secondly, you are comparing:
std::copy
. std::copy
覆盖。 std::vector<int> myVector(myints, myints+7);
If you want to build another vector using existing one, then one of the following:
std::vector<int> myVector2(myVector); std::vector<int> myVector3 = myVector; // invokes copy constructor anyway...
If you have 2 vectors already and you want to overwrite one with another, then:
myVector2 = myVector;
... just don't optimize prematurely and let your code reflect your purpose. ...只是不要过早优化,而让您的代码反映您的目的。
It's not useful for building a new container because most of the time the container itself can take iterators 这对于构建新容器没有用,因为大多数情况下容器本身可以使用迭代器
You may have to use it if you're working with raw arrays. 如果使用原始数组,则可能必须使用它。 Eg:
例如:
std::vector<int> my_vect;
int* array_for_a_low_level_lib = new int[my_vect.size()];
std::copy(std::begin(my_vect), std::end(my_vect), array_for_a_low_level_lib);
Here are two of my favorites usage examples, adding iterator
header: 这是我最喜欢的两个用法示例,其中添加了
iterator
头:
template <typename InnerType, typename Container>
void fill_container(Container& cont)
{
std::copy(std::istream_iterator<InnerType>(std::cin),
std::istream_iterator<InnerType>(),
std::inserter(cont, cont.end()));
}
template <typename InnerType, typename Container>
void print_container(const Container& cont)
{
std::copy(std::begin(cont), std::end(cont),
std::ostream_iterator<InnerType>(std::cout, " "));
}
http://ideone.com/4MOhSE http://ideone.com/4MOhSE
Also used with boost::range adapters you can do beautiful things, like filling vectors from maps in one quite readable line. 也可以与boost :: range适配器一起使用,您可以做一些漂亮的事情,例如将地图中的向量填充到一条可读的行中。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.