[英]Why use private copy constructor vs. deleted copy constructor in C++
Why would one prefer to use a private copy constructor over deleting the copy constructor in C++? 为什么要在C ++中删除复制构造函数而不是使用私有复制构造函数?
Eg: 例如:
class Entity
{
private:
Entity(const Entity ©) // <== private copy constructor
{
/* do copy stuff */
}
public:
/* more code here... */
}
As opposed to: 相对于:
class Entity
{
public:
Entity(const Entity ©) = delete; // <== copy constructor deleted
/* more code here... */
}
Related questions that don't quite answer what I'm asking: 未能完全回答我所问问题的相关问题:
What's the use of the private copy constructor in c++ C ++中的私有副本构造函数有什么用
2 possible reasons: 2个可能的原因:
you cannot use C++11 or later 您不能使用C ++ 11或更高版本
you need objects of the class to be copyable by methods of the class or it's friends, but not by anything else 您需要该类的对象可以通过该类的方法或其朋友来复制,但不能通过其他任何方法复制
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.