简体   繁体   English

重载char *和std :: string是否安全?

[英]Is it safe to overload char* and std::string?

I have just read about the overloading functions on a beginner book. 我刚刚读过初学者书中的重载函数。 Just out of curiosity I 'd like to ask whether it is safe to overload between char* and std::string. 出于好奇,我想问一下char *和std :: string之间的重载是否安全。

I played with the below code and get some result. 我玩下面的代码并获得一些结果。 But I was not sure whether it is an undefined behavior. 但我不确定它是否是一种未定义的行为。

void foo(std::string str) {
  cout << "This is the std::string version. " << endl;
}

void foo(char* str) {
  cout << "This is the char* version. " << endl;
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {

  foo("Hello"); // result shows char* version is invoked

  std::string s = "Hello";
  foo(s); // result shows std::string version

  return 0;

}

Yes, it's safe, as long as you make it const char* , and actually often useful. 是的,它是安全的,只要你使它成为const char* ,并且实际上通常很有用。 String literals cannot be converted to char* since C++11 (and it was deprecated before that). 自C ++ 11以来,字符串文字无法转换为char* (之前已弃用)。

The const char* overload will be picked for a string literal because a string literal is a const char[N] (where N is the number of characters). 将为字符串文字选择const char*重载,因为字符串文字是const char[N] (其中N是字符数)。 Overloads have a kind of priority ordering over which one will be picked when multiple would work. 重载具有一种优先级排序,当多个工作时,将对其进行选择。 It's considered a better match to perform array-to-pointer conversion than to construct a std::string . 与构造std::string相比,它被认为是执行数组到指针转换的更好匹配。

Why can overloading std::string and const char* be useful? 为什么重载std::stringconst char*会有用? If you had, for example, one overload for std::string and one for an bool , the bool would get called when you passed a string literal. 例如,如果你有一个std::string重载和一个bool重载,那么当你传递一个字符串文字时会调用bool That's because the bool overload is still considered a better match than constructing a std::string . 那是因为bool重载仍然被认为是比构造std::string更好的匹配。 We can get around this by providing a const char* overload, which will beat the bool overload, and can just forward to the std::string overload. 我们可以通过提供一个const char*重载来解决这个问题,它将超过bool重载,并且可以转发到std::string重载。

Short Answer: Perfectly safe. 简答:完全安全。 Consider the following uses: 考虑以下用途:

foo("bar");//uses c string 
foo(std::string("bar") );//uses std::string
char* bar = "bar";
foo(bar);//uses c string
std::string bar_string = "bar";
foo(bar_string);//uses std::string
foo(bar_string.c_str()); //uses c string

Word of warning, some compilers (namely those with c++11 enabled) require the const keyword in parameter specification in order to allow temporary strings to be used. 警告,一些编译器(即启用了c ++ 11的编译器)需要参数规范中的const关键字才能允许使用临时字符串。

For instance, in order to get this: foo("bar"); 例如,为了得到这个:foo(“bar”); You need this: void foo(const char* bar); 你需要这个:void foo(const char * bar);

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM