简体   繁体   English

合并排序中的垃圾值

[英]Garbage value in merge sort

While writing a simple merge sort algorithm I faced a weird problem. 在编写简单的合并排序算法时,我遇到了一个奇怪的问题。

The code is working fine until I am adding any printf() statement before return statement of mergeSort function. 直到我在mergeSort函数的return语句之前添加任何printf()语句之前,该代码才能正常工作。 If I remove that printf() statement then garbage value is coming in output. 如果删除该printf()语句,则输出中将出现垃圾值。

This is happening only when the first element of array to be sorted is largest element. 仅当要排序的数组的第一个元素为最大元素时,才会发生这种情况。

#include<stdio.h>
#include<malloc.h>
int* mergeSort(int*,int,int);

int main()
{
    int arr[] = {10,2,5,6,7,0,3,1,8};
    int i;
    int* a = mergeSort(arr,0,8);

    for(i=0;i<9;i++)
        printf("%d ",a[i]);

    printf("\n bye");
    return 0;
}

int* mergeSort(int *arr, int left, int right)
{
    int mid = (left+right)/2;
    int len = right-left+1;
    int* result = (int*) malloc(sizeof(int)*(len)), *arr1,*arr2;
    int i=0;
    int l1,l2,r1,r2;
    l2 = mid+1;

    i = 0;
    if(len < 3)
    {
        if(len == 2)
        {
            if(arr[left] > arr[right])
            {
                result[0] = arr[right];
                result[1] = arr[left] ;
            }
            else
            {
                result[0] = arr[left];
                result[1] = arr[right];
            }

            return result;
        }
        else
        {
            result[0] = arr[left];
            return result;
        }
    }

    arr1 = mergeSort(arr,left,mid);
    arr2 = mergeSort(arr,l2,right);
    l1 = 0;
    l2 = 0;
    r1 = mid-left;
    r2 = right-l2;

    while(i<len)
    {
        if(l1 > r1)
        {
            // put rest of arr2 in result and return
            while(i<len)
            {
                result[i] = arr2[l2];
                i++;
                l2++;

            }
                free(arr1);
                free(arr2);
                return result;
        }
        else if(l2 > r2)
        {
            // put rest of arr1 in result and return
            while(i<len)
            {
                result[i] = arr1[l1];
                i++;
                l1++;

            }

                free(arr1);
                free(arr2);
                return result;
        }

        if(arr1[l1] > arr2[l2])
        {
            result[i] = arr2[l2];
            l2++;
            i++;
        }
        else
        {
            result[i] = arr1[l1];
            l1++;
            i++;
        }       
    }

    free(arr1);
    free(arr2);

    //printf("Stackoverflow"); // I have to add this to make it work
    return result;
}

If I comment the third last then the code will return garbage value. 如果我在倒数第三条注释,那么代码将返回垃圾值。

Why is this problem occurring ? 为什么会出现此问题? And how can I resolve it ? 我该如何解决呢?

Here is a link to the screenshot of outputs I am getting without/with printf("Stackoverflow") statement : http://i.stack.imgur.com/OPqyd.jpg 这是我不带/带printf(“ Stackoverflow”)语句时得到的输出屏幕截图的链接: http : //i.stack.imgur.com/OPqyd.jpg

Note : It seems like it is working in other developer's system, I am using gcc 3.4.2 in mingw32. 注意:看来它正在其他开发人员的系统中工作,我在mingw32中使用gcc 3.4.2。

Answer : It seems like it it happening due to logical error in my code as Matt McNabb & Mahonri Moriancumer pointed out. 答案:好像是由于我的代码中的逻辑错误而发生的,正如Matt McNabb和Mahonri Moriancumer指出的那样。

l1 = 0; 
l2 = 0; 
r1 = mid-left; 
r2 = right-l2;

should be: 应该:

r1 = mid-left; 
r2 = right-l2;
l1 = 0; 
l2 = 0; 

Not working 不工作
Working 工作

The different behaviour seen between implementations would depend on what garbage was after you ran off the end of arr2 . 在实现之间看到的不同行为将取决于从arr2结束运行完之后是什么垃圾。

I highly recommend that you use readable variable names (not l1 !) and comment your code to indicate what it was doing, and don't re-use variables. 我强烈建议您使用可读的变量名(而不是l1 !),并注释您的代码以指示其作用,并且不要重复使用变量。 Declare variables when needing them. 在需要变量时声明它们。 You would have spotted the problem sooner if the code had been: 如果代码是,您将早点发现问题:

int arr2_starts_at = mid + 1;
// ....

int arr1_iter = 0;
int arr2_iter = 0;

// One less than the number of items in each part
int arr1_iter_limit = mid - left;
int arr2_iter_limit = right - arr2_iter;   // should be arr2_starts_at

In fact you would have put the definitions of l1 and l2 after the calculations of arr1_length etc. so you never would have had the problem. 实际上,您应该在计算arr1_length等之后放置l1l2的定义,因此您永远不会遇到问题。

I'd also prefer using the length that you are iterating over, instead of the index you are stopping at, eg 我也希望使用您要遍历的长度,而不是您要停止的索引,例如

// no comment required, "arr1_length" says it all
int arr1_length = mid - left + 1;

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM