简体   繁体   English

Scalaz验证:将验证序列转换为单个验证

[英]Scalaz validation: convert sequence of validations to a single validation

I am using scalaz validation, and have some code to validate products. 我正在使用scalaz验证,并有一些代码来验证产品。

def validateProduct(product: Option[Product]): ValidationNel[String, Product] = ???

Given a list of products, I want to get a single validation containing the whole list as a successful value or a list of validation errors. 给定一个产品列表,我希望得到一个包含整个列表的验证作为成功值或验证错误列表。 It seems like some kind of fold should do it, but I am not sure what the combination function should be. 似乎某种折叠应该这样做,但我不确定组合功能应该是什么。

 def validateProducts(products: Seq[Option[Product]]): ValidationNel[String, Seq[Product]] = {
    val listOfValidations: Seq[ValidationNel[String, Product]] = products.map(validateProduct _)
    val validatedList:ValidationNel[Seq[String], Seq[Product]] = ??? // what to do here?
    ???
  }

Any help is appreciated 任何帮助表示赞赏

If instead of a ValidationNel[List[String], List[Product]] you want a ValidationNel[String, List[Product]] (ie, all the failures in the same list), you can just use traverse : 如果您需要ValidationNel[List[String], List[Product]]不是ValidationNel[String, List[Product]] (即同一列表中的所有失败),您可以使用traverse

val result: ValidationNel[String, List[Product]] =
  products.toList.traverseU(validateProduct)

Note that I've converted the Seq to a List as there are no type class instances for raw Seq , and I'm using traverseU rather than traverse as Scala's type inference doesn't quite work for non-trivial type constructors like ValidationNel 请注意,我已经将Seq转换为List因为没有原始Seq类型类实例,并且我使用traverseU而不是traverse因为Scala的类型推断对于像ValidationNel这样的非平凡类型构造函数不太适用

You can use fold with applicative 您可以使用折叠与applicative

  import scalaz.syntax.validation._
  import scalaz.syntax.applicative._

  case class Product(name: String)

  val allGood = Seq(
    Product("a").successNel[String],
    Product("b").successNel[String]
  )

  val aggregated: ValidationNel[String, Seq[Product]] = 
    allGood.foldLeft(Seq.empty[Product].successNel[String]) {
    case (acc , v) => (acc |@| v)(_ :+ _)
  }

  println(aggregated)

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM