我正确地构建这些引用和指针函数吗？ 如果是这样，我如何明确地调用我的析构函数？

Question

Reference function:

// the getDept() function shall be defined as a reference function. That is, a call to this function will copy the
// member variable m_iDeptID into the int variable referenced by the function argument
void EmployeeRecord::getDept(int& d)
{
    d = m_iDeptID;
}

Pointer function:

// the getSalary() function shall be defined as a pointer function. That is, a call to this function will copy the
// member variable m_dSalary into the int variable pointed to by the function argument
void EmployeeRecord::getSalary(double *sal)
{
    *sal = m_dSalary;
}

Destructor (I don't have any delete statements, or anything, in the function):

// destructor - cleans up and deallocates any memory that pointers within this class may have referenced to
EmployeeRecord::~EmployeeRecord(){}

My attempt at explicitly calling the destructor:

EmployeeRecord Employee1;
Employee1.~EmployeeRecord();

So my questions are: (1) Are my reference and pointer functions consistent with their descriptions? (2) If they are, what code should I put into the block of my destructor so that I can call the destructor explicitly, and it successfully "cleans up and deallocates any memory that pointers within this class may have referenced to" (if there is, in fact, anything I need to put in the body of the destructor)?

Answer 1

In turn:

1. getDept(int &d) is consistent with its description, but getSalary(double *d) isn't quite: the description says it should copy the value into the int variable pointed to by the function argument.

   getSalary then should take a int * argument, instead of a double * argument, and the method should perform the appropriate cast. (This does seem a bit of an odd specification though — sure it wasn't meant to say double rather than int?)

2. From the information at hand, there is nothing to clean up, presuming the member variables are just int s and double s and so on. Are there any members that are pointers?