简体   繁体   English

Minitest-具有方法级别粒度的测试套件

[英]Minitest - A test suite with method-level granularity

After an upgrade, I'm finding the same several test methods failing, so I'd like to automate testing just those instead of all methods in all classes. 升级后,我发现相同的几种测试方法都失败了,所以我想自动测试那些方法,而不是自动测试所有类中的所有方法。 I want to list each class-method pair (eg TestBlogPosts.test_publish , TestUsers.test_signup ) and have them run together as a test suite. 我想列出每个类方法对(例如TestBlogPosts.test_publishTestUsers.test_signup ),并将它们作为测试套件一起运行。 Either in a file or on the command-line, I don't really care. 无论是在文件中还是在命令行中,我都不在乎。

I'm aware of these techniques to run several entire classes , but I'm looking for finer granularity here. 我知道这些技术可以运行几个完整的类 ,但是我在这里寻找更好的粒度。 (Similar to what -n /pattern/ does on the command-line - to run a subset of test methods - but across multiple classes.) (类似于-n / pattern /在命令行上执行的操作,以运行测试方法的子集,但跨多个类。)

You could renounce minitest/autorun and call Minitest.run with your self defined test selection. 您可以放弃minitest/autorun并使用自己定义的测试选项调用Minitest.run

An example: 一个例子:

gem 'minitest'
require 'minitest'
#~ require 'minitest/autorun' ##No!

#Define Test cases. 
#The `puts`-statements are kind of logging which tests are executed.
class MyTest1 < MiniTest::Test
  def test_add
    puts "call %s.%s" % [self.class, __method__]
    assert_equal(2, 1+1)
  end
  def test_subtract
    puts "call %s.%s" % [self.class, __method__]
    assert_equal(0, 1-1)
  end
end
class MyTest2 < MiniTest::Test
  def test_add
    puts "call %s.%s" % [self.class, __method__]
    assert_equal(2, 1+1)
  end
  def test_subtract
    puts "call %s.%s" % [self.class, __method__]
    assert_equal(1, 1-1)  #will fail
  end
end

#Run two suites with defined test methods.
Minitest.run(%w{-n /MyTest1.test_subtract|MyTest2.test_add/})  #select two specific test method

The result: 结果:

Run options: -n "/MyTest1.test_subtract|MyTest2.test_add/" --seed 57971

# Running:

call MyTest2.test_add
.call MyTest1.test_subtract
.

Finished in 0.002313s, 864.6753 runs/s, 864.6753 assertions/s.

2 runs, 2 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips

When you call the following test: 当您调用以下测试时:

Minitest.run(%w{-n /MyTest1.test_subtract/})  #select onespecific test method
puts '=================='
Minitest.run(%w{-n /MyTest2.test_add/})  #select one specific test method

then you get 然后你得到

Run options: -n /MyTest1.test_subtract/ --seed 18834

# Running:

call MyTest1.test_subtract
.

Finished in 0.001959s, 510.4812 runs/s, 510.4812 assertions/s.

1 runs, 1 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips
==================
Run options: -n /MyTest2.test_add/ --seed 52720

# Running:

call MyTest2.test_add
.

Finished in 0.000886s, 1128.0825 runs/s, 1128.0825 assertions/s.

1 runs, 1 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips

The Minitest.run takes the same parameters you use from the command line. Minitest.run使用与您在命令行中使用的相同的参数。 So you can use the -n option with your selection, eg /MyTest1.test_subtract|MyTest2.test_add/ . 因此,可以在选项中使用-n选项,例如/MyTest1.test_subtract|MyTest2.test_add/

You could define different tasks or methods with different Minitest.run -definition to define your test suites. 您可以使用不同的Minitest.run -definition定义不同的任务或方法,以定义您的测试套件。

Attention: No test file you load may contain a require 'minitest/autorun' . 注意:您加载的任何测试文件都不得包含require 'minitest/autorun'

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM