简体   繁体   English

Java 32bit on Win(any)64bit的后果?

[英]Consequences of Java 32bit on Win(any) 64bit?

I am trying to install JAI (Java Advanced Imaging) 1.1.3 in my Vista 64 and it says that in order for it to be installed JDK 1.3 and up must be installed. 我试图在我的Vista 64中安装JAI(Java高级映像)1.1.3,它说,要安装它,必须安装JDK 1.3及更高版本。 The problem is that I have already installed the latest JDK for Win64 and it seems that it is not willing to work with it. 问题是我已经为Win64安装了最新的JDK,似乎它不愿意使用它。
I would like to know if there are any severe consequences if I install JDK 32bit instead of the 64bit in Vista 64. 我想知道如果在Vista 64中安装32位JDK而不是64位会导致严重后果。

Thanks in advance for any advice on the subject! 预先感谢您对这个问题的任何建议!

John 约翰

I have the 32-bit JDK (1.6.0_11) installed on Vista x64 and can report no ill effects so far (after 3 months of use). 我在Vista x64上安装了32位JDK(1.6.0_11),到目前为止(在使用3个月后),可以报告没有不良影响。

Just remember it goes in Program File (x86) rather than in plain old Program Files . 只要记住它放在Program File(x86)中,而不是放在普通的旧Program Files中

I think the 64 bit Java version for Vista actually has some disadvantages, like no browser plugin (so applets will not work). 我认为Vista的64位Java版本实际上有一些缺点,例如没有浏览器插件(因此,小程序将不起作用)。 It seems that the 64 bit Java only makes sense if you really need the 64 bit capability, for normal users the intended version is still the 32 bit one. 看来,只有在您确实需要64位功能的情况下,才有可能使用64位Java,对于普通用户,预期的版本仍然是32位。

Edit: Sun has now released 64 bit versions of the browser plugin and webstart. 编辑:Sun现在已经发布了浏览器插件和Webstart的64位版本。

It is unlikely that using a 32-bit version instead of a 64-bit will make any difference unless your library uses 32-bit shared libraries. 除非您的库使用32位共享库,否则使用32位版本而不是64位不太可能有任何不同。 (and doesn't have a 64-bit version) (并且没有64位版本)

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM