[英]Setup std::vector in class constructor with different values for element constructor
I have a class with a non trivial constructor: 我有一个非常简单的构造函数的类:
class mystream
{
public:
mystream(size_t buffersize,size_t index) : buffersize(buffersize),index(index){}
size_t buffersize;
size_t index;
};
The mystream
instance has an unique id which corresponds with its position in a vector of the managing class: mystream
实例有一个唯一的id,它对应于它在管理类的向量中的位置:
class mystreammanager
{
public:
mystreammanager() : streams(8,1024, /* WHAT TO DO HERE ??? */ )
{
}
std::vector<mystream> streams;
};
How can I construct the vector and initialize its elements with an ascending value for the index? 如何构造向量并使用索引的升序值初始化其元素?
A succinct, clear and easy-to-debug way to do this is to defer the construction of the vector to a static class function: 一个简洁,清晰且易于调试的方法是将向量的构造推迟到静态类函数:
class mystreammanager
{
public:
mystreammanager() : streams{ generate_streams(1024, 8) }
{
}
private:
static std::vector<mystream> generate_streams(size_t buffersize, size_t qty)
{
std::vector<mystream> result;
result.reserve(qty);
for(size_t i = 0 ; i < qty ; ++qty) {
result.emplace_back(buffersize, i);
}
return result;
}
std::vector<mystream> streams;
};
This is optimally efficient because: 这是最佳效率,因为:
Just use a loop: 只需使用一个循环:
mystreammanager() {
streams.reserve(8);
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i) {
streams.emplace_back(1024, i);
}
}
Compile time version :) 编译时间版:)
Requires c++14
but could surely be adapted for c++11
需要
c++14
但肯定可以适应c++11
#include <cstddef>
#include <vector>
#include <utility>
class mystream
{
public:
mystream(size_t buffersize,size_t index) : buffersize(buffersize),index(index){}
size_t buffersize;
size_t index;
};
template<size_t... Indexes>
std::initializer_list<mystream> mystream_maker_impl(std::index_sequence<Indexes...>)
{
return {{1024, Indexes}...};
}
template<size_t N>
std::initializer_list<mystream> mystream_maker()
{
return mystream_maker_impl(std::make_index_sequence<N>());
}
class mystreammanager
{
public:
mystreammanager() : streams(mystream_maker<8>())
{
}
std::vector<mystream> streams;
};
You can do: 你可以做:
class mystreammanager
{
public:
mystreammanager() : streams{{1024, 0}, {1024, 1}, {1024, 2}, {1024, 3},
{1024, 4}, {1024, 5}, {1024, 6}, {1024, 7}}
{
}
std::vector<mystream> streams;
};
But doing a loop seems safer/simpler. 但做一个循环似乎更安全/更简单。
I used the answer from @RichardHodges as I was not happy with my first choice. 我使用了@RichardHodges的答案,因为我对我的第一选择不满意。 I came up with this template:
我想出了这个模板:
template<class T,class ...Args> std::vector<T> generate_with_index(size_t qty,Args ...args)
{
std::vector<T> result;
result.reserve(qty);
for(size_t i = 0 ; i < qty ; ++qty)
result.emplace_back(i, args...);
return result;
}
It helps me avoiding redundancy. 它可以帮助我避免冗余。 From a theoretical view I like @Drax solution most as it do the most work during compile time.
从理论上来看,我最喜欢@Drax解决方案,因为它在编译期间做了大部分工作。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.