简体   繁体   English

Scala用于理解Future,List和Option

[英]Scala for comprehension with Future, List and Option

I am building a reactive site in Scala and Play Framework, and my data models are such that I often need to compose Future and Option , and build Future of List / Set from previous values to get the result I need. 我在斯卡拉建设一个活性位点和播放框架,以及我的数据模型是这样的,我经常需要撰写FutureOption ,并建立FutureList / Set从以前的值以得到结果,我所需要的。

I wrote a simple app with a fake data source that you can copy and paste and it should compile. 我写了一个带有假数据源的简单应用程序,你可以复制和粘贴它,它应该编译。 My question is, how can I get the result back, in my case UserContext , in a consumable form. 我的问题是,如何以可消费的形式将结果返回到我的案例UserContext中。 Currently, I am getting back Future[Option[Future[UserContext]]] . 目前,我要回到Future[Option[Future[UserContext]]]

I want to do this in pure Scala to learn the language better, so I am avoiding Scalaz at the moment. 我想在纯Scala中这样做以更好地学习语言,所以我现在正在避开Scalaz。 Although I know I should eventually use that. 虽然我知道我最终应该使用它。

package futures

import scala.concurrent.{Future, ExecutionContext}

// http://www.edofic.com/posts/2014-03-07-practical-future-option.html
case class FutureO[+A](future: Future[Option[A]]) extends AnyVal {

  def flatMap[B](f: A => FutureO[B])(implicit ec: ExecutionContext): FutureO[B] = {
    FutureO {
      future.flatMap { optA =>
        optA.map { a =>
          f(a).future
        } getOrElse Future.successful(None)
      }
    }
  }

  def map[B](f: A => B)(implicit ec: ExecutionContext): FutureO[B] = {
    FutureO(future.map(_ map f))
  }
}

// ========== USAGE OF FutureO BELOW ============= \\

import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext.Implicits.global
import scala.concurrent.Future

object TeamDB {

  val basketballTeam = Team(id = 111, player_ids = Set(111, 222))
  val baseballTeam = Team(id = 222, player_ids = Set(333))

  def findById(teamId: Int): Future[Option[Team]] = Future.successful(
    teamId match {
      case 111 => Some(basketballTeam)
      case 222 => Some(baseballTeam)
      case _ => None
    }
  )
}

object PlayerDB {

  val basketballPlayer1 = Player(id = 111, jerseyNumber = 23)
  val basketballPlayer2 = Player(id = 222, jerseyNumber = 45)
  val baseballPlayer = Player(id = 333, jerseyNumber = 5)

  def findById(playerId: Int): Future[Option[Player]] = Future.successful(
    playerId match {
      case 111 => Some(basketballPlayer1)
      case 222 => Some(basketballPlayer2)
      case 333 => Some(baseballPlayer)
      case _ => None
    }
  )
}

object UserDB {

  // user1 is on BOTH the baseball and basketball team
  val user1 = User(id = 111, name = "Michael Jordan", player_ids = Set(111, 333), team_ids = Set(111, 222))

  // user2 is ONLY on the basketball team
  val user2 = User(id = 222, name = "David Wright", player_ids = Set(222), team_ids = Set(111))

  def findById(userId: Long): Future[Option[User]] = Future.successful(
    userId match {
      case 111 => Some(user1)
      case 222 => Some(user2)
      case _ => None
    }
  )
}

case class User(id: Int, name: String, player_ids: Set[Int], team_ids: Set[Int])
case class Player(id: Int, jerseyNumber: Int)
case class Team(id: Int, player_ids: Set[Int])
case class UserContext(user: User, teams: Set[Team], players: Set[Player])

object FutureOptionListTest extends App {

  val result = for {
    user <- FutureO(UserDB.findById(userId = 111))

  } yield for {
      players: Set[Option[Player]] <- Future.traverse(user.player_ids)(x => PlayerDB.findById(x))
      teams: Set[Option[Team]] <- Future.traverse(user.team_ids)(x => TeamDB.findById(x))

    } yield {
        UserContext(user, teams.flatten, players.flatten)

      }

  result.future // returns Future[Option[Future[UserContext]]] but I just want Future[UserContext] or UserContext
}

You have created FutureO which combines the effects of Future and Option (if you are looking into Scalaz this compares with OptionT[Future, ?] ). 您创建了FutureO ,它结合了FutureOption的效果(如果您正在研究Scalaz, OptionT[Future, ?]OptionT[Future, ?] )。

Remembering that for ... yield is analogous to FutureO.map , the result type will always be FutureO[?] (and Future[Option[?]] if you do result.future ). 记住, for ... yield类似于FutureO.map ,结果类型将始终是FutureO[?] (和Future[Option[?]]如果你执行result.future )。

The problem is you want to return a Future[UserContex] instead of a Future[Option[UserContext]] . 问题是你想要返回Future[UserContex]而不是Future[Option[UserContext]] Essentially you want to loose the Option context, so somewhere you need to explicitly handle if the user exists or not. 基本上你想要松开Option上下文,所以你需要明确处理用户是否存在的地方。

A possible solution in this case could be to leave out the FutureO since you are only using it once. 在这种情况下可能的解决方案可能是遗漏FutureO因为您只使用它一次。

case class NoUserFoundException(id: Long) extends Exception 

// for comprehension with Future
val result = for {
  user <- UserDB.findById(userId = 111) flatMap (
            // handle Option (Future[Option[User]] => Future[User])
            _.map(user => Future.successful(user))
             .getOrElse(Future.failed(NoUserFoundException(111)))
          )
  players <- Future.traverse(user.player_ids)(x => PlayerDB.findById(x))
  teams  <- Future.traverse(user.team_ids)(x => TeamDB.findById(x))
} yield UserContext(user, teams.flatten, players.flatten)
// result: scala.concurrent.Future[UserContext]

If you had multiple functions returning a Future[Option[?]] , you probably would like to use FutureO , in this case you could create an extra function Future[A] => FutureO[A] , so you can use your functions in the same for comprehension (all in the FutureO monad): 如果你有多个函数返回Future[Option[?]] ,你可能使用FutureO ,在这种情况下你可以创建一个额外的函数Future[A] => FutureO[A] ,这样你就可以使用你的函数了同样for理解(所有在FutureO monad):

def liftFO[A](fut: Future[A]) = FutureO(fut.map(Some(_)))

// for comprehension with FutureO
val futureO = for {
  user <- FutureO(UserDB.findById(userId = 111))
  players <- liftFO(Future.traverse(user.player_ids)(x => PlayerDB.findById(x)))
  teams  <- liftFO(Future.traverse(user.team_ids)(x => TeamDB.findById(x)))
} yield UserContext(user, teams.flatten, players.flatten)
// futureO: FutureO[UserContext]

val result = futureO.future flatMap (
   // handle Option (Future[Option[UserContext]] => Future[UserContext])
   _.map(user => Future.successful(user))
    .getOrElse(Future.failed(new RuntimeException("Could not find UserContext")))
)
// result: scala.concurrent.Future[UserContext]

But as you can see, you will always need to handle the "option context" before you can return a Future[UserContext] . 但正如您所看到的,在返回Future[UserContext]之前,您始终需要处理“选项上下文”。

To expand on Peter Neyens' answer, often I'll put a bunch of monad -> monad transformations in a special implicit class and import them as I need them. 为了扩展Peter Neyens的答案,我经常会在一个特殊的隐式类中放入一堆monad - > monad转换,并根据需要导入它们。 Here we have two monads, Option[T] and Future[T] . 这里我们有两个monad, Option[T]Future[T] In this case, you are treating None as being a failed Future . 在这种情况下,您将None视为失败的Future You could probably do this: 你可能会这样做:

package foo {
    class OptionOps[T](in: Option[T]) {
        def toFuture: Future[T] = in match {
            case Some(t) => Future.successful(t)
            case None => Future.failed(new Exception("option was none"))
        }
    }
    implicit def optionOps[T](in: Option[T]) = new OptionOps[T](in)
}

Then you just import it import foo.optionOps 然后你只需导入它import foo.optionOps

And then: 接着:

val a: Future[Any] = ...
val b: Option[Any] = Some("hi")
for {
    aFuture <- a
    bFuture <- b.toFuture
} yield bFuture // yields a successful future containing "hi"

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM