简体繁体 English

使用Fabric安装时，App File Size大2.5倍

[英]App File Size is 2.5x larger when installing with Fabric

原文 2016-10-11 17:39:19 2 1 ios/ xcode/ twitter-fabric

I am trying to figure out why my apps file size is so large when I install a beta build with Fabric Beta (created by Twitter). 我试图弄清楚为什么我的应用程序文件大小如此之大，当我安装使用Fabric Beta（由Twitter创建）的beta版本时。

When archiving the build and checking the app size I see that it is about 194MB, however, when I build and install the app for debugging on device, the storage space that is taken up is ~85MB. 归档构建并检查应用程序大小时，我发现它大约是194MB，但是，当我构建并安装应用程序以便在设备上进行调试时，占用的存储空间大约为85MB。

When I install the app via Fabric Beta, the app is ~194MB on device. 当我通过Fabric Beta安装应用程序时，该应用程序在设备上大约为194MB。

Would anyone be able to explain what is going on here. 有人能够解释这里发生了什么。 Is there an issue with Fabric that is not optimizing the build? Fabric没有优化构建的问题吗？

1 个解决方案

Old question, but worth clarifying I think real quick: 老问题，但值得澄清我认为真的很快：

1 comment said: 1评论说：

Most likely the ipa for uploading has arm6 and arm7 binaries in it. 很可能用于上传的ipa中包含arm6和arm7二进制文件。 As long as you have bitcode turned on then App thinning will only push down the parts that an individual device needs. 只要你打开bitcode，那么App thinning只会降低单个设备所需的部件。

And this is true, and then this follow up comment from original question author 这是真的，然后这是原始问题作者的后续评论

I see. 我懂了。 And is there any way to confirm this for a client? 有没有办法为客户确认这个？ Because Fabric has been the only platform we have been using. 因为Fabric是我们一直使用的唯一平台。 Will I see the correct file size with iTunes Test Flight? 我会在iTunes Test Flight中看到正确的文件大小吗？

The answer to that is yes. 答案是肯定的。 Test flight, since basically the closest you can get to the App Store without actually getting reviewed (although TestFlight requires Beta App Review, but this is usually pretty quick. 测试飞行，因为基本上你最接近App Store而没有实际审查（虽然TestFlight需要Beta App Review，但这通常很快。

TestFlight should handle the proper app thinning and send you only the app binary sized for your device. TestFlight应该处理正确的应用程序细化，并仅向您发送适合您设备的应用程序二进制文件。