[英]How come <T extends Comparable<T>> working as <T extends Comparable<? super T>>?
suppose we have 假设我们有
class Fruit implements Comparable<Fruit>
{
@Override
public int compareTo(Fruit o) { return 0; }
}
class Apple extends Fruit{}
class Main
{
public static void main (String args[])
{
function(new Apple()); // this shouldn't work because Apple is implementing Comparable<Fruit>, not Comparable<Apple>
}
public static<T extends Comparable<T>> void function(T t){}
}
Code is working without any issue. 代码可以正常工作。
My question is why <T extends Comparable<T>>
working like <T extends Comparable<? super T>>
我的问题是为什么<T extends Comparable<T>>
像<T extends Comparable<? super T>>
一样工作<T extends Comparable<? super T>>
<T extends Comparable<? super T>>
. <T extends Comparable<? super T>>
。 whats the difference ? 有什么不同 ?
Thanks. 谢谢。
In this case it is beacuse class Fruit
is a superclass of itself 在这种情况下,是因为类Fruit
是自身的超类
The difference is here 区别在这里
<T extends Comparable<T>>
accepts Comparable with arguement of type T
<T extends Comparable<? super T>>
<T extends Comparable<T>>
接受Comparable与type T
争论<T extends Comparable<? super T>>
<T extends Comparable<? super T>>
accepts Comparable with arguements of type T and its super classes
. <T extends Comparable<? super T>>
接受<T extends Comparable<? super T>>
type T and its super classes
其父type T and its super classes
争论。 Here Since in java every class is a superclass of itself, Fruit is also a superclass of Fruit
.Thats why you see like they are working the same way But if you used class Apple
as T
you will see the difference. 由于在Java中每个类都是其自身的超类,因此Fruit is also a superclass of Fruit
这就是为什么您看到它们以相同的方式工作的原因,但是如果您将Apple
类用作T
您会发现其中的区别。
You compile with Java 8 I think. 我认为您可以使用Java 8进行编译。 Because, before Java 8, you should not pass the compilation and have this error : 因为在Java 8之前,您不应该通过编译并出现以下错误:
Bound mismatch: The generic method function(T) of type Main is not applicable for the arguments (Apple). 边界不匹配:Main类型的通用方法函数(T)不适用于自变量(Apple)。 The inferred type Apple is not a valid substitute for the bounded parameter > 推断的类型Apple不是边界参数的有效替代品>
I think what you read in your book refers to generic use before Java 8. 我认为您在书中所读的内容是指Java 8之前的通用用法。
But i didn't know that Java 8 had less constraint on this kind of case. 但是我不知道Java 8对这种情况的约束较少。
Is it a side-effect of the large use of inference in Java 8 that Java 8 calls the "improved inference" ? Java 8称为“改进的推理”是否是Java 8中大量使用推理的副作用?
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.