简体   繁体   English

C#比较两个相同对象类型的列表

[英]C# Compare two list of same object type

I am trying to compare two list of same type using multiple properties of that type. 我正在尝试使用该类型的多个属性比较两个相同类型的列表。

For example, 例如,

I have a class named Details 我有一个名为Details的类

public class Details
{
    public   int id;
    public string symbol;
    public string code;
}

I have below two lists: 我有以下两个列表:

List<Details> list1 = new List<Details>();  
List<Details> list2 = new List<Details>();

list1.Add(new Details() { id=1,symbol="ANSI",code="NITE"});
list1.Add(new Details() { id = 1, symbol = "ANSI", code = "CALGO" });
list1.Add(new Details() { id = 1, symbol = "ANSI", code = "CANT" });
list1.Add(new Details() { id=2,symbol="ANSI",code="NITE"});
list1.Add(new Details() { id = 2, symbol = "ANSI", code = "CALGO" });
list1.Add(new Details() { id = 2, symbol = "ANSI", code = "CANT" });

list2.Add(new Details() { id = 1, symbol = "ANSI", code = "NITE" });
list2.Add(new Details() { id = 1, symbol = "ANSI", code = "CALGO" });
list2.Add(new Details() { id = 2, symbol = "ANSI", code = "NITE" });

I want only that data from List1 which has same id, symbol but different code. 我只想要来自List1的具有相同ID,符号但不同代码的数据。

So, in above scenario result will be as below. 因此,在上述情况下结果将如下所示。

list1.Add(new Details() { id = 1, symbol = "ANSI", code = "CANT" });
list1.Add(new Details() { id = 2, symbol = "ANSI", code = "CALGO" });
list1.Add(new Details() { id = 2, symbol = "ANSI", code = "CANT" });

It would be great if this can be achieved through Linq instead of using foreach. 如果可以通过Linq而不是使用foreach来实现,那就太好了。

I tried below but that's not correct. 我在下面尝试过,但这是不正确的。

var temp =list1.Where(x=>list2.Any(z=>x.id==z.id && string.Equals(x.symbol,z.symbol) && !string.Equals(x.code,z.code)));

It looks like you need rows to satisfy two conditions, not one, in order to make the output: 看起来您需要满足两个条件而不是一个条件的行才能生成输出:

  • There needs to be a match on id and symbol , and idsymbol必须匹配,并且
  • There must be no match on id , symbol , and code . idsymbolcode不得匹配。

Here is how to do that with LINQ directly: 这是直接使用LINQ的方法:

var tmp = list1.Where(x=>
    list2.Any(z=>x.id==z.id && x.symbol==z.symbol)
&& !list2.Any(z => x.id==z.id && x.symbol==z.symbol && x.code==z.code));

Demo. 演示。

An alternative based on applying De Morgan's laws : 基于应用戴摩根定律的另一种选择:

var tmp = list1.Where(x=>
    list2.Any(z=>x.id==z.id && x.symbol==z.symbol)
 && list2.All(z => x.id!=z.id || x.symbol!=z.symbol || x.code!=z.code));

Demo. 演示。

1) I would first override Equals (and also GetHashCode ) 1)我将首先覆盖Equals (以及GetHashCode

public class Details
{
    public int id;
    public string symbol;
    public string code;

    public override int GetHashCode()
    {
        return (id + symbol + code).GetHashCode();
    }

    public override bool Equals(object obj)
    {
        var other = obj as Details;
        if (other == null) return false;

        return id == other.id && symbol == other.symbol && code == other.code;
    }
}

Then you can use Linq as 然后您可以使用Linq作为

var result = list1.Except(list2).ToList();

It returns the result you expect... 它返回您期望的结果...


2) Same result can also be obtained without changing the Details object and by implementing a custom IEqualityComparer 2)在不更改Details对象和实现自定义IEqualityComparer情况下,也可以获得相同的结果

public class DetailsComparer : IEqualityComparer<Details>
{
    public bool Equals(Details x, Details y)
    {
        return x.id == y.id && x.symbol == y.symbol && x.code == y.code;
    }

    public int GetHashCode(Details obj)
    {
        return (obj.id + obj.symbol + obj.code).GetHashCode();
    }
}

Then your linq would be 然后你的linq将是

var result = list1.Except(list2, new DetailsComparer()).ToList();

Those ways are better than O(n*n) algorithms utilizing of Any and All 这些方法比利用AnyAll O(n * n)算法要好

of course, you can do compare like your code, but if you want your code are more structure you can override method Equals() and Operator == : 当然,您可以像代码一样进行比较,但是如果您希望代码更具结构性,则可以覆盖方法Equals()和Operator ==

public class Details
{
    public int id;
    public string symbol;
    public string code;

    public override bool Equals(System.Object obj)
    {
        if (obj == null) {
            return false;
        }

        Details detail = obj as Details;
        if ((System.Object) detail == null) {
          return false;
        }

        return (id == detail.id) && (symbol == detail.symbol);
    }

    public bool Equals(other) {
        return this.id == other.id && this.symbole == other.symbol;
    }

    public override int GetHashCode() {
        return id ^ symbol.GetHashCode();
    }
}

then you can compare two Detail object directly. 那么您可以直接比较两个Detail对象。

Do this: 做这个:

public class DetailsComparer : IEqualityComparer<Details>
{

    public bool Equals(Details x, Details y)
        => x.id == y.id && x.symbol == y.symbol && x.code == y.code;

    public int GetHashCode(Details obj)
         => obj.code.GetHashCode();
}

And use wery simple this 并使用简单

var x = list1.Except(list2, new DetailsComparer());

result x: 结果x:

1, ANSI, CANT 1,ANSI,CANT

2, ANSI, CALGO 2,ANSI,CALGO

2, ANSI, CANT 2,ANSI,CANT

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM