简体   繁体   English

为什么模板参数会丢失常量?

[英]Why is the template parameter losing constness?

I thought this is a very basic question but I could not find something similar. 我认为这是一个非常基本的问题,但我找不到类似的东西。

The following code does not compile (C3668) 以下代码无法编译(C3668)

struct Param
{
    int a;
    int b;
};

template <typename T>
struct Foo
{
    virtual void doStuff (const T) const = 0;
};

struct Bar : public Foo<Param&>
{
    void doStuff (const Param &) const override
    {
        /*...*/
    }
};

It will compile after removing the const from 它将在删除const后编译

void doStuff (const Param &)

What am I missing here? 我在这里错过了什么? I would expect to enforce to the const Param& in Foo::doStuff with my interface declaration. 我希望通过我的接口声明强制执行const Param& in Foo::doStuff Instead it seems to be removed. 相反它似乎被删除了。

The const isn't just a text substitution, it applies to the entire type T . const不仅仅是文本替换,它适用于整个类型T

If T is Param& , const T and const Param& are not equivalent; 如果TParam&const Tconst Param&不等价; the former is the same as Param& const , which is equivalent to Param& . 前者与Param& const相同,相当于Param&
It becomes more obvious if you write the less common "postfix-const" form: T const and Param const & can't be equivalent regardless of what T is. 如果你编写不太常见的“postfix-const”形式就会变得更加明显:无论T是什么, T T constParam const &都不能相等。

Thus, your "override" doesn't override anything and you get a compilation error. 因此,您的“覆盖”不会覆盖任何内容,并且您会收到编译错误。

When you have 当你有

doStuff (const T)

it is not the same type as 它与...不是同一类型

doStuff (const Param &)

The first one is a constant whatever T is so in this case you have a constant reference to a T which really doesn't make sense since references cannot be rebound. 第一个是常量,无论T是什么,所以在这种情况下,你有一个对T的恒定引用,这实际上没有意义,因为引用不能被反弹。 In the later it is a reference to a const Param . 在后面它是对const Param的引用。

What you could do is change 你能做的就是改变

struct Bar : public Foo<Param&>

to

struct Bar : public Foo<Param>

and then 然后

virtual void doStuff (const T) const = 0;

to

virtual void doStuff (const T&) const = 0;

Problem is not with const .Problem is with the override. 问题不在于const。问题与覆盖有关。 Member function declared with override doesn't override a base class member 使用override声明的成员函数不会覆盖基类成员

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM