简体   繁体   English

如何在SQL Server上不使用“ WITH”或子查询的情况下简化此查询?

[英]How can I simplify this query without “WITH” or Subquery on SQL server?

I've a query that filter my table for positive stock in my warehouse and stores. 我有一个查询,用于过滤我的表中仓库和商店中的正库存。

I need to take only positive value and if one of values is positive I take this value only. 我只需要取正值,如果其中一个值为正,我就只取这个值。

WITH Resultat AS
(
    SELECT AR_Ref,StockDepots,StockStores,
        CASE 
         WHEN StockDepots > 0 AND StockStores > 0  THEN StockDepots + StockStores
         WHEN StockDepots > 0 THEN StockDepots
         WHEN StockStores > 0 THEN StockStores
         ELSE StockDepots + StockStores
        END AS StockMulti
    FROM ArticleStock 
)    
SELECT * FROM Resultat
WHERE StockMulti > 0
ORDER BY AR_Ref

Fiddle : http://rextester.com/RMSU6120 小提琴: http : //rextester.com/RMSU6120

My query result is Ok, I need to know How can I simplify this query without "WITH" or Subquery ? 我的查询结果是好的,我需要知道如何在没有“ WITH”或“子查询”的情况下简化此查询?

EDIT** 编辑**

Why I don't need WITH or SubQuery is because I think is overkill in this case and I think it's possible to make this query without WITH or Subquery. 为什么我不需要WITH或SubQuery是因为在这种情况下我认为是矫kill过正,并且我认为可以在没有WITH或Subquery的情况下进行此查询。

What's wrong with a CTE or a sub-select? CTE或子选择有什么问题?

Here are some approaches, which should be equivalent: 以下是一些方法,应该等效:

--Uses row-wise calculation with CROSS APPLY -使用CROSS APPLY逐行计算

SELECT AR_Ref,StockDepots,StockStores
      ,ca.StockMulti
FROM ArticleStock 
CROSS APPLY(SELECT CASE 
                    WHEN StockDepots > 0 AND StockStores > 0  THEN StockDepots + StockStores
                    WHEN StockDepots > 0 THEN StockDepots
                    WHEN StockStores > 0 THEN StockStores
                    ELSE StockDepots + StockStores END) AS ca(StockMulti)
WHERE StockMulti > 0
ORDER BY AR_Ref;

--Doubles the CASE --Doubles的CASE

SELECT AR_Ref,StockDepots,StockStores
      ,CASE 
        WHEN StockDepots > 0 AND StockStores > 0  THEN StockDepots + StockStores
        WHEN StockDepots > 0 THEN StockDepots
        WHEN StockStores > 0 THEN StockStores
        ELSE StockDepots + StockStores END AS StockMulti
FROM ArticleStock 
WHERE CASE 
        WHEN StockDepots > 0 AND StockStores > 0  THEN StockDepots + StockStores
        WHEN StockDepots > 0 THEN StockDepots
        WHEN StockStores > 0 THEN StockStores
        ELSE StockDepots + StockStores END > 0
ORDER BY AR_Ref;

--If I get this right, it should be enough to check for WHERE StockStores > 0 OR StockDepots > 0 -如果我做对了,那么检查WHERE StockStores > 0 OR StockDepots > 0应该足够了

SELECT AR_Ref,StockDepots,StockStores
      ,CASE 
        WHEN StockDepots > 0 AND StockStores > 0  THEN StockDepots + StockStores
        WHEN StockDepots > 0 THEN StockDepots
        WHEN StockStores > 0 THEN StockStores
        ELSE StockDepots + StockStores END AS StockMulti
FROM ArticleStock 
WHERE StockStores > 0 OR StockDepots > 0
ORDER BY AR_Ref;

Well, you could do this: 好吧,你可以这样做:

 SELECT AR_Ref,StockDepots,StockStores,
    CASE 
     WHEN StockDepots > 0 AND StockStores > 0  THEN StockDepots + StockStores
     WHEN StockDepots > 0 THEN StockDepots
     WHEN StockStores > 0 THEN StockStores
    END AS StockMulti
FROM ArticleStock 
WHERE StockDepots > 0 or StockStores > 0
ORDER BY AR_Ref

Note that the "else" in the original case statement would never get exercised, because you are only using rows where one of the values is > 0. I removed it, as it may cause confusion. 请注意,原始case语句中的“ else”将永远不会执行,因为您只使用其中一个值大于0的行。我删除了它,因为这可能会引起混淆。

You can use directly in where condition: 您可以在以下条件下直接使用:

SELECT AR_Ref,StockDepots,StockStores,
    CASE 
     WHEN StockDepots > 0 AND StockStores > 0  THEN StockDepots + StockStores
     WHEN StockDepots > 0 THEN StockDepots
     WHEN StockStores > 0 THEN StockStores
     ELSE StockDepots + StockStores
    END AS StockMulti
FROM ArticleStock 
where       (CASE 
     WHEN StockDepots > 0 AND StockStores > 0  THEN StockDepots + StockStores
     WHEN StockDepots > 0 THEN StockDepots
     WHEN StockStores > 0 THEN StockStores
     ELSE StockDepots + StockStores
    END) > 0
order by AR_Ref

You can push the data into a Temp Table and then later use that table in a simple way. 您可以将数据推送到Temp Table ,然后以一种简单的方式使用该表。

SELECT AR_Ref,StockDepots,StockStores,
    CASE 
     WHEN StockDepots > 0 AND StockStores > 0  THEN StockDepots + StockStores
     WHEN StockDepots > 0 THEN StockDepots
     WHEN StockStores > 0 THEN StockStores
     ELSE StockDepots + StockStores
    END AS StockMulti INTO #Test
FROM #ArticleStock 

SELECT * FROM #Test WHERE StockMulti > 0

Try this: 尝试这个:

SELECT * FROM
(
    SELECT AR_Ref,StockDepots,StockStores,
        CASE 
         WHEN StockDepots > 0 AND StockStores > 0  THEN StockDepots + StockStores
         WHEN StockDepots > 0 THEN StockDepots
         WHEN StockStores > 0 THEN StockStores
         ELSE StockDepots + StockStores
        END AS StockMulti
    FROM ArticleStock 
)    
Resultat
WHERE StockMulti > 0
ORDER BY AR_Ref

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM