简体   繁体   English

创建numpy 2d索引数组的最快方法

[英]fastest way to create numpy 2d array of indices

I want to create a numpy 2d array containning the cells indices, for example such 2x2 mat can be created using : 我想创建一个包含单元格索引的numpy 2d数组,例如可以使用以下命令创建这样的2x2 mat:

np.array([[[0,0],[0,1]],[[1,0],[1,1]]])

In other words cell at index i,j should contain the list [i,j] . 换句话说,索引i,j处的单元格应包含列表[i,j]

I could make a nested loop to do it c way but i am wondering if there is a fast pythonic way to do that? 我可以做一个嵌套循环来做到这一点,但我想知道是否有一个快速的pythonic方式来做到这一点?

For performance with NumPy, I would suggest an array initialization based approach - 对于使用NumPy的性能,我建议基于数组初始化的方法 -

def indices_array(n):
    r = np.arange(n)
    out = np.empty((n,n,2),dtype=int)
    out[:,:,0] = r[:,None]
    out[:,:,1] = r
    return out

For a generic (m,n,2) shaped output, we need some modifications : 对于通用(m,n,2)形状的输出,我们需要一些修改:

def indices_array_generic(m,n):
    r0 = np.arange(m) # Or r0,r1 = np.ogrid[:m,:n], out[:,:,0] = r0
    r1 = np.arange(n)
    out = np.empty((m,n,2),dtype=int)
    out[:,:,0] = r0[:,None]
    out[:,:,1] = r1
    return out

Note: Also, read - 2019 addendum later on in this post for perf. 注意:另外,请阅读本文后面的2019年附录 boost with large m , n . mn增强。

Sample run - 样品运行 -

In [145]: n = 3

In [146]: indices_array(n)
Out[146]: 
array([[[0, 0],
        [0, 1],
        [0, 2]],

       [[1, 0],
        [1, 1],
        [1, 2]],

       [[2, 0],
        [2, 1],
        [2, 2]]])

If you needed a 2 columns 2D array, simply reshape - 如果您需要22D数组,只需重塑 -

In [147]: indices_array(n).reshape(-1,2)
Out[147]: 
array([[0, 0],
       [0, 1],
       [0, 2],
       [1, 0],
       [1, 1],
       [1, 2],
       [2, 0],
       [2, 1],
       [2, 2]])

Timings and verification - 时间和验证 -

In [141]: n = 100   
     ...: out1 = np.array(list(product(range(n), repeat=2))).reshape(n,n,2)
     ...: out2 = indices_array(n)
     ...: print np.allclose(out1, out2)
     ...: 
True

# @Ofek Ron's solution
In [26]: %timeit np.array(list(product(range(n), repeat=2))).reshape(n,n,2)
100 loops, best of 3: 2.69 ms per loop

In [27]: # @Brad Solomon's soln    
    ...: def ndindex_app(n):
    ...:    row, col = n,n
    ...:    return np.array(list(np.ndindex((row, col)))).reshape(row, col, 2)
    ...: 

# @Brad Solomon's soln 
In [28]: %timeit ndindex_app(n)
100 loops, best of 3: 5.72 ms per loop

# Proposed earlier in this post
In [29]: %timeit indices_array(n)
100000 loops, best of 3: 12.1 µs per loop

In [30]: 2690/12.1
Out[30]: 222.31404958677686

200x+ speedup there for n=100 with the initialization based one! 200x+200x+加速, n=100 ,基于初始化!


2019 addendum 2019年附录

We can also use np.indices - 我们也可以使用np.indices -

def indices_array_generic_builtin(m,n):
    return np.indices((m,n)).transpose(1,2,0)

Timings - 计时 -

In [115]: %timeit indices_array_generic(1000,1000)
     ...: %timeit indices_array_generic_builtin(1000,1000)
100 loops, best of 3: 2.92 ms per loop
1000 loops, best of 3: 1.37 ms per loop
np.array(list(product(range(n), repeat=2))).reshape(n,n,2)

这很有效

You want np.ndindex . 你想要np.ndindex

def coords(row, col):
    return np.array(list(np.ndindex((row, col)))).reshape(row, col, 2)

coords(3, 2)
Out[32]: 
array([[[0, 0],
        [0, 1]],

       [[1, 0],
        [1, 1]],

       [[2, 0],
        [2, 1]]])

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM