替换具有平面子范围的数字列表

Question

Given a list of numbers, like this:

lst = [0, 10, 15, 17]

I'd like a list that has elements from i -> i + 3 for all i in lst . If there are overlapping ranges, I'd like them merged.

So, for the example above, we first get:

[0, 1, 2, 3,     10, 11, 12, 13,     15, 16, 17, 18,   17, 18, 19, 20]

But for the last 2 groups, the ranges overlap, so upon merging them, you have:

[0, 1, 2, 3,     10, 11, 12, 13,     15, 16, 17, 18,     19, 20]

This is my desired output.

This is what I've thought of:

from collections import OrderedDict

res = list(OrderedDict.fromkeys([y for x in lst for y in range(x, x + 4)]).keys())
print(res) = [0, 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]

However, this is slow ( 10000 loops, best of 3: 56 µs per loop ). I'd like a numpy solution if possible, or a python solution that's faster than this.

Answer 1

Approach #1 : One approach based on broadcasted summation and then using np.unique to get unique numbers -

np.unique(np.asarray(lst)[:,None] + np.arange(4))

Approach #2 : Another based on broadcasted summation and then masking -

def mask_app(lst, interval_len = 4):
    arr = np.array(lst)
    r = np.arange(interval_len)
    ranged_vals = arr[:,None] + r
    a_diff = arr[1:] - arr[:-1]
    valid_mask = np.vstack((a_diff[:,None] > r, np.ones(interval_len,dtype=bool)))
    return ranged_vals[valid_mask]

Runtime test

Original approach -

from collections import OrderedDict
def org_app(lst):
    list(OrderedDict.fromkeys([y for x in lst for y in range(x, x + 4)]).keys())

Timings -

In [409]: n = 10000

In [410]: lst = np.unique(np.random.randint(0,4*n,(n))).tolist()

In [411]: %timeit org_app(lst)
     ...: %timeit np.unique(np.asarray(lst)[:,None] + np.arange(4))
     ...: %timeit mask_app(lst, interval_len = 4)
     ...: 
10 loops, best of 3: 32.7 ms per loop
1000 loops, best of 3: 1.03 ms per loop
1000 loops, best of 3: 671 µs per loop

In [412]: n = 100000

In [413]: lst = np.unique(np.random.randint(0,4*n,(n))).tolist()

In [414]: %timeit org_app(lst)
     ...: %timeit np.unique(np.asarray(lst)[:,None] + np.arange(4))
     ...: %timeit mask_app(lst, interval_len = 4)
     ...: 
1 loop, best of 3: 350 ms per loop
100 loops, best of 3: 14.7 ms per loop
100 loops, best of 3: 9.73 ms per loop

The bottleneck with the two posted approaches seems like is with the conversion to array , though that seems to be paying off well afterwards. Just to give a sense of the time spent on the conversion for the last dataset -

In [415]: %timeit np.array(lst)
100 loops, best of 3: 5.6 ms per loop