简体   繁体   English

在C#7本地方法中重新引入新的通用参数是否是一种好习惯?

[英]Is it a good practice to reintroduce new generic parameters in C# 7 Local Methods?

I was experimenting with C# 7's new features and especially local methods. 我正在尝试C#7的新功能,尤其是本地方法。 I wrote the Linq Where Operator. 我写了Linq Where运算符。

I implemented the iterator block as a local method (indeed I read articles saying that local methods are a perfect solution for async methods and iterators). 我将迭代器块实现为本地方法(实际上,我读过一些文章说,本地方法是异步方法和迭代器的理想解决方案)。

I'm wondering if there is a difference between those two implementations, and if not which one is the best? 我想知道这两种实现之间是否有区别,如果没有,那是最好的?

First implementation: 第一次执行:

Here I introduced new generic type parameter for the local method, new names for the parameters... 在这里,我为本地方法引入了新的泛型类型参数,为参数引入了新名称...

public static  IEnumerable<TSource> Where<TSource> (this IEnumerable<TSource> source,  Func<TSource, bool> predicate) {
    if(source == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(source));
    if(predicate == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(predicate));
    return WhereIterator(source,  predicate);

    IEnumerable<TSequence> WhereIterator<TSequence> (IEnumerable<TSequence> localSource,  Func<TSequence, bool>  localPredicat) {
        foreach(TSequence item in localSource) {
            if(localPredicat(item)) {
                yield return item;
            }
        }
    }
}

Second implementation: 第二实施:

No new generic parameter, no new parameters since the local method can capture the variables of the enclosing method. 没有新的通用参数,也没有新参数,因为本地方法可以捕获封闭方法的变量。

public static  IEnumerable<TSource> Where<TSource> (this IEnumerable<TSource> source,  Func<TSource, bool> predicate) {
    if(source == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(source));
    if(predicate == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(predicate));
    return  WhereIterator();

    IEnumerable<TSource> WhereIterator () {
        foreach(TSource item in source) {
            if(predicate(item))
                yield return item;
            }
        }
    }
}

Your second implementation is better. 您的第二个实现更好。 The main difference is that the second implementation captures its parameters implicitly, freeing you from repeating yourself: 主要区别在于第二种实现隐式捕获其参数,使您不必重复自己的工作:

  • when specifying parameter types, 指定参数类型时,
  • when specifying parameter names, and 指定参数名称时,以及
  • when passing arguments to the function. 将参数传递给函数时。

Avoiding repetition is a very important programming practice, so you should prefer your second implementation. 避免重复是非常重要的编程习惯,因此您应该选择第二种实现。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM