[英]Unexpected behaviour in Ruby for “puts {}.class”
puts {}.class
#=> NilClass
puts "".class
String
#=> nil
puts [].class
Array
#=> nil
Why is puts {}.class
not showing Hash
as output and then nil
like the others? 为什么
puts {}.class
不显示Hash
作为输出,然后像其他人一样nil
?
puts {}
is interpreted as puts
method call with empty block passed into it, hence the empty result. puts {}
被解释为puts
方法调用,其中传入空块,因此为空结果。 puts({}.class)
works as you expect. puts({}.class)
按预期工作。
There are a couple things to understand: 有几点需要了解:
whenever a hash is the first argument to a method being called, you need to use parenthesis or remove the braces, otherwise ruby thinks it's a block. 每当哈希是被调用方法的第一个参数时,你需要使用括号或删除大括号,否则ruby认为它是一个块。 So
puts { foo: "bar" }
raises a syntax error, but puts foo: "bar"
, puts(foo: "bar")
, or puts({foo: "bar"})
work fine. 所以
puts { foo: "bar" }
会引发语法错误,但puts foo: "bar"
, puts(foo: "bar")
或puts({foo: "bar"})
工作正常。
every method can be called with a block, however only some methods actually call the block. 可以使用块调用每个方法,但只有一些方法实际上调用了块。 You can test it for yourself -
puts(1) { raise }
just outputs the number, and doesn't raise an error. 您可以自己测试 -
puts(1) { raise }
只输出数字,并且不会引发错误。 puts { 1 }
prints nothing, because the block isn't called. puts { 1 }
什么都不打印,因为没有调用块。
The puts
method always returns nil. puts
方法总是返回nil。 So when you say puts {}.class
, that's basically the same as puts.class
, which is NilClass 因此,当你说
puts {}.class
,它与puts.class
基本相同,它是NilClass
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.