[英]Pricing: AWS Dynamo db vs AWS Cloudwatch
Does Cloudwatch cost more than Dynamodb for storage or my understanding is wrong? Cloudwatch的存储成本是否超过Dynamodb,否则我的理解是错误的?
From the pricing pages: 从定价页面:
https://aws.amazon.com/cloudwatch/pricing/ - From this, in the logs section of us-east-1, it looks like it is costing 0.50$/GB https://aws.amazon.com/cloudwatch/pricing/-从这开始,在us-east-1的日志部分中,它的成本为0.50 $ / GB
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/dynamodb-price-reduction-and-new-reserved-capacity-model/ - From this, it looks like it is costing 0.250$/GB. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/dynamodb-price-reduction-and-new-reserved-capacity-model/-从此看来,它的成本为0.250 $ / GB。
So, here it looks like cloudwatch for logs cost more than dynamodb for actual data? 因此,在这里看来,用于日志的cloudwatch的成本要比用于实际数据的dynamodb高? Am I understanding something wrong?
我理解不对吗?
I always used to think that cloudwatch is cheaper since it uses S3 or something and also logs we create are normally more than the actual data. 我一直认为Cloudwatch便宜,因为它使用S3或其他东西,而且我们创建的日志通常比实际数据还要多。
There are many dimensions to the pricing for each service. 每种服务的定价都有很多方面。
The pure storage cost for Amazon DynamoDB is $0.25/GB/month. Amazon DynamoDB的纯存储成本为$ 0.25 / GB /月。 (There are also costs for read/write capacity.)
(读/写容量也有成本。)
The Store (Archival) cost for Amazon CloudWatch Logs is $0.03/GB/month. Amazon CloudWatch Logs的存储(存档)成本为$ 0.03 / GB /月。 This is similar to Amazon S3 storage costs of $0.023/GB/month for standard storage.
这类似于标准存储的Amazon S3存储成本$ 0.023 / GB /月。
The $0.50/GB figure you quote for CloudWatch appears to be the Collect (Data Ingestion) charge, which is not for storage. 您为CloudWatch报价的$ 0.50 / GB数据似乎是收取(数据提取)费用,不用于存储。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.