简体   繁体   English

使用表推导式对 itab 进行分组 + 聚合

[英]Grouping + aggregation of itab with table comprehensions

Rather typical task but I'm stuck on doing it in a beautiful way.相当典型的任务,但我坚持以一种美丽的方式完成它。

For example, I need to find the last shipment for each vendor, ie to find delivery with the max date for the each vendor例如,我需要找到每个供应商的最后一次发货,即找到每个供应商的最大日期的交货

VENDOR     DELIVERY   DATE
10          00055    01/01/2019
20          00070    01/19/2019
20          00088    01/20/2019
20          00120    11/22/2019
40          00150    04/01/2019
40          00200    04/10/2019

The result table to be populated要填充的结果表

VENDOR     DELIVERY   DATE
10          00055    01/01/2019
20          00120    11/22/2019
40          00200    04/10/2019

I implemented this in a following way, via DESCENDING, which I find very ugly我通过以下方式实现了这一点,通过 DESCENDING,我觉得这很丑陋

LOOP AT itab ASSIGNING <wa> GROUP BY ( ven_no = <wa>-ven_no ) REFERENCE INTO DATA(vendor).
  LOOP AT GROUP vendor ASSIGNING <ven> GROUP BY ( date = <vendor>-date ) DESCENDING.
    CHECK NOT line_exists( it_vend_max[ ven_no = <ven>-ven_no ] ).
    it_vend_max = VALUE #( BASE it_vend_max ( <ven> ) ).
  ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.

Is there more elegant way to do this?有没有更优雅的方法来做到这一点?

I also tried REDUCE我也试过REDUCE

result = REDUCE #( vend_line = value ty_s_vend()
                   MEMBERS = VALUE ty_t_vend( )
                   FOR GROUPS <group_key> OF <wa> IN itab
                   GROUP BY ( key = <wa>-ven_no count = GROUP SIZE
                   ASCENDING
         NEXT vend_line = VALUE #(
              ven_no = <wa>-ven_no

              date  = REDUCE i( INIT max = 0
                                FOR m IN GROUP <group_key>
                                NEXT max = nmax( val1 = m-date
                                                 val2 = <wa>-date ) )
              deliv_no  = <wa>-deliv_no
         MEMBERS = VALUE ty_s_vend( FOR m IN GROUP <group_key> ( m ) ) ).

but REDUCE selects max date from the whole table and it selects only flat structure , which is not what I want.但是REDUCE从整个表中选择 max date 并且它只选择flat structure ,这不是我想要的。 However, in ABAP examples I saw samples where table-to-table reductions are also possible.但是,在 ABAP 示例中,我看到了也可以进行表到表缩减的示例。 Am I wrong?我错了吗?

Another thing I tried is finding uniques with WITHOUT MEMBERS but this syntax doesn't work:我尝试的另一件事是使用WITHOUT MEMBERS查找唯一值,但此语法不起作用:

it_vend_max = VALUE ty_t_vend( FOR GROUPS value OF <line> IN itab 
                               GROUP BY ( <line>-ven_no <line>-ship_no ) 
                               WITHOUT MEMBERS ( lifnr = value 
                                                 date = nmax( val1 = <line>-date 
                                                              val2 = value-date ) ) ).

Any suggestion of what is wrong here or own elegant solution is appreciated.任何关于这里有什么问题的建议或自己的优雅解决方案表示赞赏。

If not too complex, I think it's best to use one construction expression, which shows that the goal of the expression is to initialize one variable and nothing else.如果不是太复杂,我认为最好使用一个构造表达式,这表明该表达式的目标是初始化一个变量,而不是其他任何东西。

The best I could do to be the most performing and the shortest possible, but I can't make it elegant:我所能做的最好的事情是表现最好和尽可能短,但我不能让它优雅:

TYPES ty_ref_s_vend TYPE REF TO ty_s_vend.

result = VALUE ty_t_vend(
    FOR GROUPS <group_key> OF <wa> IN itab
    GROUP BY ( ven_no = <wa>-ven_no ) ASCENDING
    LET max2 = REDUCE #(
        INIT max TYPE ty_ref_s_vend
        FOR <m> IN GROUP <group_key>
        NEXT max = COND #( WHEN max IS NOT BOUND
                             OR <m>-date > max->*-date
                           THEN REF #( <m> ) ELSE max ) )
    IN ( max2->* ) ).

As you can see I use a data reference ( aux_ref_s_vend2 ) for a better performance, to point to the line which has the most recent date.如您所见,我使用数据参考 ( aux_ref_s_vend2 ) 以获得更好的性能,以指向具有最新日期的行。 It's theoretically faster than copying the bytes of the whole line, but it's less readable.理论上它比复制整行的字节更快,但可读性较差。 If you don't have a huge table, there won't be a big difference between using an auxiliary data reference or an auxiliary data object.如果你没有一个巨大的表,使用辅助数据引用或辅助数据对象之间不会有很大的区别。

PS: I could not test it because the question does not provide a MCVE . PS:我无法测试它,因为问题没有提供MCVE

Here is another solution if you really want to use REDUCE in the primary constructor expression (but it's not needed):如果您真的想在主构造函数表达式中使用 REDUCE,这是另一种解决方案(但不需要):

result = REDUCE ty_t_vend(
    INIT vend_lines TYPE ty_t_vend
    FOR GROUPS <group_key> OF <wa> IN itab
    GROUP BY ( ven_no = <wa>-ven_no ) ASCENDING
    NEXT vend_lines = VALUE #(
        LET max2 = REDUCE ty_ref_s_vend(
            INIT max TYPE ty_ref_s_vend
            FOR <m> IN GROUP <group_key>
            NEXT max = COND #( WHEN max IS NOT BOUND
                                 OR <m>-date > max->*-date
                               THEN REF #( <m> ) ELSE max ) )
        IN BASE vend_lines
        ( max2->* ) ) ).

what do you mean by elegant solution?优雅的解决方案是什么意思? Using GROUP or REDUCE with the "new" abap syntax is not making it elegant in any way, at least for me...将 GROUP 或 REDUCE 与“新的”abap 语法一起使用并没有使它变得优雅,至少对我而言......

For me, coding that is easily understandable for everyone is elegant:对我来说,每个人都容易理解的编码是优雅的:

SORT itab BY vendor date DESCENDING.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES from itab COMPARING vendor.

Or if the example is more complex, a simple LOOP AT with IF or AT in it APPENDING aggregated lines to a new itab, will also solve it.或者,如果示例更复杂,一个简单的带有IFAT LOOP AT将聚合行APPENDING到新的 itab,也可以解决它。 Example here . 示例在这里

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM