简体   繁体   English

正确使用malloc和strcat以避免使用valgrind出现内存错误

[英]Correct use of malloc and strcat to avoid memory errors with valgrind

I have stored vertices in my tempStorage : 我已经在tempStorage中存储了顶点:

typedef struct {
    int pred[8];
    int succ[8];
} arc_set;

arc_set tempStorage;

for example .pred are 0,1,1,2,2 and .succ are 2,2,3,3,1 例如.pred是0,1,1,2,2和.succ是2,2,3,3,1

I have made a char *links = malloc(sizeof(char) * 100); 我做了一个char *links = malloc(sizeof(char) * 100); to store these numbers and print them like this: 存储这些数字并像这样打印它们:

            char *temp = malloc(10);

            for (int l = 0; l < 8; l++){

                    sprintf(temp, "%d-%d ", tempStorage.pred[l], tempStorage.succ[l]);
                    strcat(links, temp);

            }
            free(temp);

            fprintf(stdout, "Solution %d edges: %s",countLinks, links);
            fprintf(stdout, "\n");

storing strings in format "%d-%d " in temp with sprintf and then with strcat concat that with links. 使用sprintf然后使用带有链接的strcat concat将temp格式的字符串存储为“%d-%d”格式。

it does print everything correctly but when I test it with valgrind --leak-check=full --track-origins=yes -v ./programname I do get: 它确实可以正确打印所有内容,但是当我用valgrind --leak-check=full --track-origins=yes -v ./programname我得到了:

Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==12322==    at 0x4C2C66A: strcat (vg_replace_strmem.c:307)
==12322==    by 0x4013CC: main (program.c:251)
==12322==  Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
==12322==    at 0x4C29BC3: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
==12322==    by 0x401270: main (program.c:225)

where c:251 is strcat(links, temp); 其中c:251是strcat(links, temp); and c:225 is my char *links = malloc(sizeof(char) * 100); c:225是我的char *links = malloc(sizeof(char) * 100);

am I using strcat wrong or what is the problem here? 我使用strcat错了吗?还是这是什么问题?

Memory you've got from malloc isn't zero-initialized by default. 默认情况下,您从malloc获得的malloc不是零初始化的。 And strcat will append the new to the end of the string. 并且strcat会将新内容附加到字符串的末尾。 For non-zero-initialized chunk of memory that could be just anywhere. 对于非零初始化的内存块,该内存块可能随处可见。

You don't need to set the whole links to zero -- just first byte would be enough. 您无需将整个links设置为零-仅第一个字节就足够了。 Still memset(links, 0, 100); 仍然memset(links, 0, 100); right after malloc would not hurt. malloc之后不会受到伤害。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM