简体   繁体   English

如何使过载更简单

[英]How can I make overload simpler

I have a helper class that handles some methods for a toolbar. 我有一个帮助程序类,用于处理工具栏的某些方法。 Now I have created 5 constructor with different overloads. 现在,我创建了5个具有不同重载的构造函数。 My question is, how can I make this contructor overload simpler? 我的问题是,如何使这种构造器过载更简单? The way I am doing it works, but in case I will need to implement fe 10 RichTextBoxes, I don't want to create an overload for every possible RichTextBox and handle everyone in the methods. 我的工作方式有效,但是如果我需要实现10个RichTextBoxes,我不想为每个可能的RichTextBox创建重载并处理方法中的每个人。 I'm convinced there is a simpler way but one way or another, I can see to figure this out. 我相信,有一种更简单的方法,但一种或另一种,我可以看出来。

I tried to make a List but get errors in return that I can't make a list of a namespace which is logic. 我试图创建一个列表,但得到错误,但无法返回逻辑上的命名空间列表。

    public class RichtTextBoxHelper
    {
    private RichTextBox _textBox;
    private RichTextBox _textbox2;
    private RichTextBox _textbox3;
    private RichTextBox _textbox4;
    private RichTextBox _textbox5;

    public RichtTextBoxHelper(RichTextBox textBox)
    {
        _textBox = textBox;
    }
    public RichtTextBoxHelper(RichTextBox textBox, RichTextBox textbox2)
    {
        _textBox = textBox;
        _textbox2 = textbox2;
    }

    public RichtTextBoxHelper(RichTextBox textBox, RichTextBox textbox2, RichTextBox textbox3)
    {
        _textBox = textBox;
        _textbox2 = textbox2;
        _textbox3 = textbox3;
    }

    public RichtTextBoxHelper(RichTextBox textBox, RichTextBox textbox2, RichTextBox textbox3, RichTextBox textbox4)
    {
        _textBox = textBox;
        _textbox2 = textbox2;
        _textbox3 = textbox3;
        _textbox4 = textbox4;
    }

    public RichtTextBoxHelper(RichTextBox textBox, RichTextBox textbox2, RichTextBox textbox3, RichTextBox textbox4, RichTextBox textbox5)
    {
        _textBox = textBox;
        _textbox2 = textbox2;
        _textbox3 = textbox3;
        _textbox4 = textbox4;
        _textbox5 = textbox5;
    }

    public void CutClick()
    {
        _textBox.Cut();
        _textbox2.Cut();
        _textbox3.Cut();
        _textbox4.Cut();
        _textbox5.Cut();
    }

Various methods like the cut one. 各种方法都喜欢切一。

Is there an easier, more clean way to do this? 有没有更简单,更干净的方法来做到这一点?

You should use an array of RichTextBox s: 您应该使用RichTextBox的数组:

private RichTextBox[] textBoxes;

Now you only need one constructor: 现在您只需要一个构造函数:

public RichtTextBoxHelper(params RichTextBox[] textBoxes) {
    this.textBoxes = textBoxes ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(textBoxes));
}

If there is a maximum number of text boxes that you can handle, just make a check: 如果您可以处理的文本框数量最多,请检查一下:

public RichtTextBoxHelper(params RichTextBox[] textBoxes) {
    if (textBoxes is null)
    {
        throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(textBoxes));
    }

    if (textBoxes.Length > maxTextBoxes) :
        throw new ArgumentException("Too many text boxes!", nameof(textBoxes))
    }
    this.textBoxes = textBoxes;
}

The CutClick method can be simply: CutClick方法可以很简单:

public void CutClick() {
    foreach(var textBox in textBoxes) {
        textBox.Cut();
    }
}

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM