合并对象（关联数组）

Question

What's the best/standard way of merging two associative arrays in JavaScript? Does everyone just do it by rolling their own for loop?

Answer 1

with jquery you can call $.extend

var obj1 = {a: 1, b: 2};
var obj2 = {a: 4, c: 110};

var obj3 = $.extend(obj1, obj2); 

obj1 == obj3 == {a: 4, b: 2, c: 110} // Pseudo JS

(assoc. arrays are objects in js)

look here: http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.extend/

---

edit: Like rymo suggested, it's better to do it this way:

obj3 = $.extend({}, obj1, obj2); 
obj3 == {a: 4, b: 2, c: 110}

As here obj1 (and obj2) remain unchanged.

---

edit2: In 2018 the way to do it is via Object.assign :

var obj3 = Object.assign({}, obj1, obj2); 
obj3 === {a: 4, b: 2, c: 110} // Pseudo JS

If working with ES6 this can be achieved with the Spread Operator :

const obj3 = { ...obj1, ...obj2 };

Answer 2

Now in 2016 I would say the best/standard way is Object.assign()
Pure Javascript. No jQuery is needed.

obj1 = {a: 1, b: 2};
obj2 = {a: 4, c: 110};
obj3 = Object.assign({},obj1, obj2);  // Object {a: 4, b: 2, c: 110}

More information, examples and polyfill here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/assign

Answer 3

This is how Prototype does it:

Object.extend = function(destination, source) {
    for (var property in source) {
        if (source.hasOwnProperty(property)) {
            destination[property] = source[property];
        }
    }
    return destination;
};

called as, for example:

var arr1　= { robert: "bobby", john: "jack" };
var arr2 = { elizabeth: "liz", jennifer: "jen" };

var shortnames = Object.extend(arr1,arr2);

EDIT : added hasOwnProperty() check as correctly pointed out by bucabay in comments

Answer 4

Keep it simple...

function mergeArray(array1,array2) {
  for(item in array1) {
    array2[item] = array1[item];
  }
  return array2;
}

Answer 5

Underscore also has an extend method:

Copy all of the properties in the source objects over to the destination object. It's in-order, so the last source will override properties of the same name in previous arguments.

_.extend(destination, *sources) 

_.extend({name : 'moe'}, {age : 50});
=> {name : 'moe', age : 50}

Answer 6

在dojo中 ，2对象/数组“merge”将是lang.mixin(destination, source) - 您还可以将多个源混合到一个目标等中 - 有关详细信息，请参阅mixin函数的参考 。

Answer 7

Rolling Your Own Extend/Mixin Function

function extend(objects) {
    var args
        , first = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0, 1)[0]
        , second;

    if (arguments.length > 1) {
        second = Array.prototype.splice.call(arguments, 1, 1)[0];
        for (var key in second) {
            first[key] = second[key];
        }
        args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0);
        return extend.apply(this, args);
    }

    return first;
}

...

var briansDirections = {
    step1: 'Remove pastry from wrapper.',
    step2: 'Place pastry toaster.',
    step3: 'Remove pastry from toaster and enjoy.',
};
extend(briansDirections, { step1: 'Toast Poptarts' }, { step2: 'Go ahead, toast \'em' }, { step3: 'Hey, are you sill reading this???' });

...

This simply extends a splat of objects, recursively. Also, note that this recursive function is TCO ( Tail-Call Optimized ) as its return is the last call to itself.

Additionally, you may want targeted properties . In this case, you may want to condense objects based upon id , quantity , or another property. This approach could have a small book written about it and requires object-juxtaposition and can get very complex. I've written a small library for this which is available upon request.

Hope this helps!

Answer 8

do you want to overwrite a property if the names are the same but the values are not?

And do you want to permanently change one of the original objects,

or do you want a new merged object returned?

function mergedObject(obj1, obj2, force){
    for(var p in obj1) this[p]= obj1[p];
    for(var p in obj2){
        if(obj2.hasOwnProperty(p)){
            if(force || this[p]=== undefined) this[p]= obj2[p];
            else{
                n= 2;
                while(this[p+n]!== undefined)++n;
                this[p+n]= obj2[p];
            }
        }
    }
}

Answer 9

1. In Javascript there is no notion of associative array, there are objects
2. The only way to merge two objects is to loop for their properties and copy pointers to their values that are not primitive types and values for primitive types to another instance

Answer 10

jquery has a boolean for deep copy. You could do something like that:

MergeRecursive = function(arr1, arr2){
    $.extend(true, arr1, arr2);
    return arr1;                
};

Also you can edit this function to support n-arrays to merge.

ArrayMergeRecursive = function(){
     if(arguments.length < 2){
          throw new Error("ArrayMergeRecursive: Please enter two or more objects to merge!");
     }

    var arr1=arguments[0];
    for(var i=0; i<=arguments.length; i++ ){
        $.extend(true, arr1, arguments[i]);                 
    }

    return arr1;                
};

So now you can do

var arr1 = {'color': {'mycolor': 'red'}, 3: 5},
    arr2 = {4: 10, 'color': {'favorite': 'green', 0: 'blue'}},
    arr3 = ['Peter','Jhon','Demosthenes'],
    results = ArrayMergeRecursive(arr1, arr2, arr3); // (arr1, arr2 ... arrN)
console.log("Result is:", results);

Answer 11

Yahoo UI (YUI) also has a helper function for this:

http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/yahoo/yahoo_merge.html

YAHOO.namespace('example');

YAHOO.example.set1 = { foo : "foo" };
YAHOO.example.set2 = { foo : "BAR", bar : "bar" };
YAHOO.example.set3 = { foo : "FOO", baz : "BAZ" };

var Ye = YAHOO.example;

var merged = YAHOO.lang.merge(Ye.set1, Ye.set2, Ye.set3);

Answer 12

In 2019 you have 2 good options:

Object assigning [ doc ]

const result = Object.assign({}, baseObject, updatingObject);

Object spreading [ doc ]

const result = { ...baseObject, ...updatingObject};

The first one tends to be safer, more standard and polyvalent. A good pros and cons here

Answer 13

I needed a deep-object-merging. So all of the other answers didn't help me very much. _.extend and jQuery.extend do well, unless you have a recursive array like i do. But it ain't so bad, you can program it in five minutes:

var deep_merge = function (arr1, arr2) {
    jQuery.each(arr2, function (index, element) {
        if (typeof arr1[index] === "object" && typeof element === "object") {
            arr1[index] = deep_merge(arr1[index], element);
        } else if (typeof arr1[index] === "array" && typeof element === "array") {
            arr1[index] = arr1[index].concat(element);
        } else {
            arr1[index] = element;
        }
    });
    return arr1;
}

Answer 14

To merge arrays in jQuery what about $.merge?

var merged = $.merge([{id:3, value:'foo3'}], [{id:1, value:'foo1'}, {id:2, value:'foo2'}]);
merged[0].id == 3;
merged[0].value == 'foo3';
merged[1].id == 1;
merged[1].value == 'foo1';
merged[2].id == 2;
merged[2].value == 'foo2';

Answer 15

Recursive solution (extends also arrays of objects) + null checked

var addProps = function (original, props) {
    if(!props) {
        return original;
    }
    if (Array.isArray(original)) {
        original.map(function (e) {
            return addProps(e, props)
        });
        return original;
    }
    if (!original) {
        original = {};
    }
    for (var property in props) {
        if (props.hasOwnProperty(property)) {
            original[property] = props[property];
        }
    }
    return original;
};

Tests

console.log(addProps([{a: 2}, {z: 'ciao'}], {timestamp: 13}));
console.log(addProps({single: true}, {timestamp: 13}));
console.log(addProps({}, {timestamp: 13}));
console.log(addProps(null, {timestamp: 13}));

[ { a: 2, timestamp: 13 }, { z: 'ciao', timestamp: 13 } ]
{ single: true, timestamp: 13 }
{ timestamp: 13 }
{ timestamp: 13 }

Answer 16

Here is the best solution.

obj1.unshift.apply( obj1, obj2 );

Also, obj1 can grow inside a loop without any problem. (lets say obj2 is dynamic)