Scala 小猫：隐式 Sequencer 值似乎不适用于上下文绑定语法

Question

In my understanding the following two functions and their calls should be identical:

def f1[L1 <: HList, L2](xs: L1)(implicit sequencer: Sequencer.Aux[L1, Option, L2]) {
  println(xs.sequence)
}

def f2[L1 <: HList : Sequencer.Aux[*, Option, L2], L2](xs: L1) {
  println(xs.sequence)
}

f1[Option[Int] :: Option[String] :: HNil, Int :: String :: HNil](Some(42) :: Some("foo") :: HNil)
f2[Option[Int] :: Option[String] :: HNil, Int :: String :: HNil](Some(42) :: Some("foo") :: HNil)

However, the call to f2 doesn't compile:

could not find implicit value for evidence parameter of type cats.sequence.Sequencer[Option[Int] :: Option[String] :: shapeless.HNil]{type F[X] = Option[X]; type LOut = Int :: String :: shapeless.HNil}

The Scala compile seems to expand the type alias Sequencer.Aux in the second case and isn't able to construct a suitable implicit.

If I directly define my function with the expanded type, no implicit can be constructed either:

def f3[L1 <: HList, L2](xs: L1)(implicit sequencer: Sequencer[L1]{type F[X] = Option[X]; type LOut = L2}) {
  println(xs.sequence)
}

Apart from the inconvenience of not being able to use the more compact context bound syntax there are two things that I don't understand about this situation:

1. why is the type of the evidence implicit only expanded if i use the context bound syntax? (and are there more semantical differences between the two syntaxes?)
2. why is Scala unable to construct a suitable implicit for the expanded case? After all, Sequencer.Aux is only a type alias defined like this:

type Aux[L <: HList, F0[_], LOut0] = Sequencer[L] {
  type F[X] = F0[X]
  type LOut = LOut0
}

I would have expected both types to behave identical.

Answer 1

Looks like a bug. Bugs should be reported here: https://github.com/scala/bug/issues

I tried to create minimal example.

And maybe I oversimplified the example but now I have issues even with HNil case.

For

import cats.Applicative import shapeless.{::, HList, HNil} import cats.instances.option._ trait Sequencer[L <: HList] extends Serializable { type F[_] } object Sequencer { type Aux[L <: HList, F0[_]] = Sequencer[L] { type F[X] = F0[X] } implicit def nil[F0[_]]( implicit F: Applicative[F0] ): Aux[HNil, F0] = null }

implicitly[Sequencer.Aux[HNil, Option]] compiles but implicitly[Sequencer[HNil]{type F[X] = Option[X]}] doesn't and there is warning ( scalacOptions += "-Xlog-implicits" )

 //Information: App.this.Sequencer.nil is not a valid implicit value for App.Sequencer[shapeless.HNil]{type F[X] = Option[X]} because: //hasMatchingSymbol reported error: could not find implicit value for parameter F: cats.Applicative[Option[X]]

And probably here we can see the reason: could not find implicit value for parameter F: cats.Applicative[Option[X]] should be could not find implicit value for parameter F: cats.Applicative[Option] .

But for some reason if I remove implicit F: Applicative[F0] then for

import shapeless.{::, HList, HNil} trait Sequencer[L <: HList] extends Serializable { type F[_] } object Sequencer { type Aux[L <: HList, F0[_]] = Sequencer[L] { type F[X] = F0[X] } implicit def nil[F0[_]](): Aux[HNil, F0] = null }

implicitly[Sequencer.Aux[HNil, Option]] doesn't compile although implicitly[Sequencer.Aux[HNil, Option]](Sequencer.nil()) compiles.

implicitly[Sequencer[HNil]{type F[X] = Option[X]}] doesn't compile either. And if we write implicitly[Sequencer[HNil]{type F[X] = Option[X]}](Sequencer.nil()) we'll see why

//Error: inferred kinds of the type arguments (Option[X]) do not conform to the expected kinds of the type parameters (type F0). //Option[X]'s type parameters do not match type F0's expected parameters: //class Option has one type parameter, but type F0 has one

... has one type parameter, but... has one shows that this is a bug.

Bug tracker shows open issues for "implicit" and "higher-kind"

https://github.com/scala/bug/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+implicit+higher-kind