梯度累积与自定义 model.fit TF.Keras？

Question

Please add a minimum comment on your thoughts so that I can improve my query. Thanks. :)

---

I'm trying to train a tf.keras model with Gradient Accumulation (GA). But I don't want to use it in the custom training loop ( like ) but customizing the .fit() method by overriding the train_step .Is it possible? How to accomplish this? The reason is if we want to get the benefit of keras built-in functionality like fit , callbacks , we don't want to use the custom training loop but at the same time if we want to override train_step for some reason (like GA or else) we can customize the fit method and still get the leverage of using those built-in functions.

And also, I know the pros of using GA but what are the major cons of using it? Why it's not come as a default but an optional feature with the framework?

# overriding train step 
# my attempt 
# it's not appropriately implemented 
# and need to fix 
class CustomTrainStep(tf.keras.Model):
    def __init__(self, n_gradients, *args, **kwargs):
        super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
        self.n_gradients = n_gradients
        self.gradient_accumulation = [tf.zeros_like(this_var) for this_var in \
                                           self.trainable_variables]

    def train_step(self, data):
        x, y = data
        batch_size = tf.cast(tf.shape(x)[0], tf.float32)  
        # Gradient Tape
        with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
            y_pred = self(x, training=True)
            loss = self.compiled_loss(y, y_pred, regularization_losses=self.losses)
        # Calculate batch gradients
        gradients = tape.gradient(loss, self.trainable_variables)
        # Accumulate batch gradients
        accum_gradient = [(acum_grad+grad) for acum_grad, grad in \
               zip(self.gradient_accumulation, gradients)]
        accum_gradient = [this_grad/batch_size for this_grad in accum_gradient]
        # apply accumulated gradients
        self.optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(accum_gradient, self.trainable_variables))
        # TODO: reset self.gradient_accumulation 
        # update metrics
        self.compiled_metrics.update_state(y, y_pred)
        return {m.name: m.result() for m in self.metrics}

Please, run and check with the following toy setup.

# Model 
size = 32
input = tf.keras.Input(shape=(size,size,3))
efnet = tf.keras.applications.DenseNet121(weights=None,
                                          include_top = False, 
                                          input_tensor = input)
base_maps = tf.keras.layers.GlobalAveragePooling2D()(efnet.output) 
base_maps = tf.keras.layers.Dense(units=10, activation='softmax', 
                                             name='primary')(base_maps) 
custom_model = CustomTrainStep(n_gradients=10, inputs=[input], outputs=[base_maps])

# bind all
custom_model.compile(
    loss = tf.keras.losses.CategoricalCrossentropy(),
    metrics = ['accuracy'],
    optimizer = tf.keras.optimizers.Adam() )

# data 
(x_train, y_train), (_, _) = tf.keras.datasets.mnist.load_data()
x_train = tf.expand_dims(x_train, -1)
x_train = tf.repeat(x_train, 3, axis=-1)
x_train = tf.divide(x_train, 255)
x_train = tf.image.resize(x_train, [size,size]) # if we want to resize 
y_train = tf.one_hot(y_train , depth=10) 

# customized fit 
custom_model.fit(x_train, y_train, batch_size=64, epochs=3, verbose = 1)

---

Update

I've found that some others also tried to achieve this and ended up with the same issue. One has got some workaround, here , but it's too messy and I think there should be some better approach.

Answer 1

Yes it is possible to customize the .fit() method by overriding the train_step without a custom training loop, following simple example will show you how to train a simple mnist classifier with gradient accumulation :

import tensorflow as tf

# overriding train step 
# my attempt 
# it's not appropriately implemented 
# and need to fix 
class CustomTrainStep(tf.keras.Model):
    def __init__(self, n_gradients, *args, **kwargs):
        super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
        self.n_gradients = tf.constant(n_gradients, dtype=tf.int32)
        self.n_acum_step = tf.Variable(0, dtype=tf.int32, trainable=False)
        self.gradient_accumulation = [tf.Variable(tf.zeros_like(v, dtype=tf.float32), trainable=False) for v in self.trainable_variables]

    def train_step(self, data):
        self.n_acum_step.assign_add(1)

        x, y = data
        # Gradient Tape
        with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
            y_pred = self(x, training=True)
            loss = self.compiled_loss(y, y_pred, regularization_losses=self.losses)
        # Calculate batch gradients
        gradients = tape.gradient(loss, self.trainable_variables)
        # Accumulate batch gradients
        for i in range(len(self.gradient_accumulation)):
            self.gradient_accumulation[i].assign_add(gradients[i])
 
        # If n_acum_step reach the n_gradients then we apply accumulated gradients to update the variables otherwise do nothing
        tf.cond(tf.equal(self.n_acum_step, self.n_gradients), self.apply_accu_gradients, lambda: None)

        # update metrics
        self.compiled_metrics.update_state(y, y_pred)
        return {m.name: m.result() for m in self.metrics}

    def apply_accu_gradients(self):
        # apply accumulated gradients
        self.optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(self.gradient_accumulation, self.trainable_variables))

        # reset
        self.n_acum_step.assign(0)
        for i in range(len(self.gradient_accumulation)):
            self.gradient_accumulation[i].assign(tf.zeros_like(self.trainable_variables[i], dtype=tf.float32))

# Model 
input = tf.keras.Input(shape=(28, 28))
base_maps = tf.keras.layers.Flatten(input_shape=(28, 28))(input)
base_maps = tf.keras.layers.Dense(128, activation='relu')(base_maps)
base_maps = tf.keras.layers.Dense(units=10, activation='softmax', name='primary')(base_maps) 
custom_model = CustomTrainStep(n_gradients=10, inputs=[input], outputs=[base_maps])

# bind all
custom_model.compile(
    loss = tf.keras.losses.CategoricalCrossentropy(),
    metrics = ['accuracy'],
    optimizer = tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=1e-3) )

# data 
(x_train, y_train), (_, _) = tf.keras.datasets.mnist.load_data()
x_train = tf.divide(x_train, 255)
y_train = tf.one_hot(y_train , depth=10) 

# customized fit 
custom_model.fit(x_train, y_train, batch_size=6, epochs=3, verbose = 1)

Outputs:

Epoch 1/3
10000/10000 [==============================] - 13s 1ms/step - loss: 0.5053 - accuracy: 0.8584
Epoch 2/3
10000/10000 [==============================] - 13s 1ms/step - loss: 0.1389 - accuracy: 0.9600
Epoch 3/3
10000/10000 [==============================] - 13s 1ms/step - loss: 0.0898 - accuracy: 0.9748

Pros:

Gradient accumulation is a mechanism to split the batch of samples — used for training a neural network — into several mini-batches of samples that will be run sequentially

Because GA calculates the loss and gradients after each mini-batch, but instead of updating the model parameters, it waits and accumulates the gradients over consecutive batches, so it can overcoming memory constraints, ie using less memory to training the model like it using large batch size.

Example: If you run a gradient accumulation with steps of 5 and batch size of 4 images, it serves almost the same purpose of running with a batch size of 20 images.

We could also parallel the training when using GA, ie aggregate gradients from multiple machines.

Things to consider:

This technique is working so well so it is widely used, there few things to consider before using it that I don't think it should be called cons, after all, all GA does is turning 4 + 4 to 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 .

If your machine has sufficient memory for the batch size that already large enough then there no need to use it, because it is well known that too large of a batch size will lead to poor generalization, and it will certainly run slower if you using GA to achieve the same batch size that your machine's memory already can handle.

Reference:

What is Gradient Accumulation in Deep Learning?

Answer 2

Thanks to @Mr.For Example for his convenient answer.

Usually, I also observed that using Gradient Accumulation , won't speed up training since we are doing n_gradients times forward pass and compute all the gradients. But it will speed up the convergence of our model. And I found that using the mixed_precision technique here can be really helpful here. Details here .

policy = tf.keras.mixed_precision.Policy('mixed_float16')
tf.keras.mixed_precision.experimental.set_policy(policy)

Here is a complete gist .