简体   繁体   English

进行简单性能测试的更好方法

[英]Better way to do simple performance testing

When comparing the performance of operations this is how I would typicaly do the tests: 比较操作性能时,这就是我通常进行的测试:

<?php
$w = 'world';
$start1 = microtime(true);
for($i=0;$i<10000;$i++)
    echo 'Hello ' . $w . '!';
$end1 = microtime(true);

$start2 = microtime(true);
for($i=0;$i<10000;$i++)
    echo "Hello $w!";
$end2 = microtime(true);

$start3 = microtime(true);
for($i=0;$i<10000;$i++)
    echo 'Hello ' + $w + '!';
$end3 = microtime(true);

echo "\n\n\n";
echo 'Concatination: ' . ($end1 - $start1) . "\nInline Var: " . ($end2 - $start2) . "\nAddition Operator: " . ($end3 - $start3);

Is there a better way to do these tests, possibly a more reliable way? 有没有更好的方法来进行这些测试,也许是更可靠的方法? It seems that if I run the same tests several times that I can get wildly different results, for example I ran the above several times and this is what I got. 看来,如果我多次运行相同的测试,我会得到截然不同的结果,例如,我多次运行以上测试,这就是我得到的结果。

Concatination: 0.057300090789795
Inline Var: 0.092978954315186
Addition Operator: 0.090532064437866

Concatination: 0.10458517074585
Inline Var: 0.075299978256226
Addition Operator: 0.039528131484985

Concatination: 0.063031911849976
Inline Var: 0.07781195640564
Addition Operator: 0.022316932678223

Concatination: 0.079019069671631
Inline Var: 0.030484914779663
Addition Operator: 0.096056938171387

Concatination: 0.077842950820923
Inline Var: 0.052779912948608
Addition Operator: 0.037421941757202

Concatination: 0.084203004837036
Inline Var: 0.013757944107056
Addition Operator: 0.074331045150757

Concatination: 0.027930021286011
Inline Var: 0.05648398399353
Addition Operator: 0.049610137939453

Concatination: 0.041821956634521
Inline Var: 0.047034978866577
Addition Operator: 0.062538862228394

Concatination: 0.0071420669555664
Inline Var: 0.066315889358521
Addition Operator: 0.004756927490234

Concatination: 0.088988065719604
Inline Var: 0.022722959518433
Addition Operator: 0.06276798248291

As you can see at each running there may be vastly different results. 如您所见,每次运行可能会有截然不同的结果。

Try xdebug, it can profile your code as it runs, producing a trace file. 尝试使用xdebug,它可以在代码运行时对其进行概要分析,从而生成跟踪文件。 This can then be run through wincachegrind/kcachegrind or similar, to give you details about how your execution peformed, what took the time, etc etc. 然后可以通过wincachegrind / kcachegrind或类似程序运行此程序,以向您提供有关执行方式,花费时间等的详细信息。

Zend Platform also includes a profiler, if you have that available. Zend Platform还包括一个探查器(如果有)。 I can't remember if the free Zend Debugger and/or Zend Server Community Edition includes the profiler as well, but its another option to profile your code if you can get to it. 我不记得免费的Zend Debugger和/或Zend Server Community Edition是否也包括了探查器,但是它是对代码进行探查的另一种选择。

Personally, I prefer xdebug. 就个人而言,我更喜欢xdebug。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM