简体   繁体   English

不依赖于泛型类型的特征或方法

[英]Trait or method that does not depend on generic type

I have a generic structure in rust that has one general field, in this case val and a type specific field:我在 rust 中有一个通用结构,它有一个通用字段,在本例中为val和一个类型特定字段:

struct A<T> {
    val: i32,
    t: T
}

What I am trying to do is to have a method associated to the struct regardless the type T .我想要做的是让一个方法与结构相关联,而不管类型T Something that I can call like this:我可以这样称呼的东西:

A::my_method()

Instead of:代替:

A::<T>::my_method()

I tried implementing a trait called Get on A<T> and call it as follows:我尝试在A<T>上实现一个名为Get的特性,并按如下方式调用它:

struct A<T> {
    val: i32,
    t: T
}

trait Get {
    type ValType;
    fn get_val() -> Self::ValType;
}

impl<T> Get for A<T> {
    type ValType = i32;
    
    fn get_val() -> Self::ValType {
        2
    }
}

fn main() {
    let a = A {
        val: 2,
        t: 3.0
    };
    
    // This is the call I want, if possible
    println!("{:?}", A::get_val());
}

The issue is that it doesn't compile, which is to be expected.问题是它无法编译,这是可以预料的。 The outcome I want is something like this:我想要的结果是这样的:

impl<T> Get for A<any T> {
    type ValType = i32;
    
    fn get_val() -> Self::ValType {
        2
    }
}

I found on some posts that a workaround is to have a dummy type parameter and call my function as this:我在一些帖子中发现解决方法是使用虚拟类型参数并将我的 function 称为:

struct DummyType;

fn main() {
    let a = A {
        val: 2,
        t: 3.0
    };
    
    // This is the call I want, if possible
    println!("{:?}", A::<DummyType>::get_val());
}

What you are probably missing is a method receiver.您可能缺少的是方法接收器。


pub struct A<T> {
    pub field: usize,
    pub something: T,
}

pub trait Getter {
    type Output;
    fn get(&self) -> Self::Output;
}

impl<T> Getter for A<T> {
    type Output = usize;
    fn get(&self) -> Self::Output {
        self.field
    }
}

fn main() {
    let a = A { field: 10, something: 3.0 };
    assert_eq!(a.get(), 10);
}

Here you can return the state of A and not just constant.在这里您可以返回A的 state 而不仅仅是常量。

First, your design looks wrong.首先,你的设计看起来不对。 If the type is generic, what does it mean to have a non-generic method?如果类型是通用的,那么拥有非通用方法意味着什么?

Anyway, you can use a sentinel type (and you don't need a trait for that, I don't really get why you put it in the first place):无论如何,你可以使用一个哨兵类型(你不需要一个特征,我真的不明白你为什么把它放在第一位):

impl A<()> {
    fn get_val() -> i32 {
        2
    }
}

The compiler infers T to be () automatically when you call A::get_val() .当您调用A::get_val()时,编译器会自动将T推断为() )。

Playground . 游乐场

Fine, I tried this and rust seems to be okay with it:好吧,我试过了,rust 似乎没问题:

pub trait Get {
    type Output;
    fn get() -> Self::Output;
}

pub struct A<T>(T);

impl Get for A<()> {
    type Output = usize;
    fn get() -> Self::Output {
        2
    }
}

fn main() {
    println!("{}", A::get());
}

The () is the best pick here as you want to express that parameter is not important to us here but also not declare a type just for that. ()是这里的最佳选择,因为您想表达该参数在这里对我们并不重要,但也不要为此声明类型。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM