为什么`std::deque`对`constexpr`不友好？

Question

I'm learning the c++ STL and it came to my attention that while most functionalities supported by std::vector and std::array (contiguous storage) are marked with constexpr , that's not the case for std::deque and other non-contiguous storages. So I spent some time doing some research, I found a proposal in 2019, Making std::deque constexpr , and std::deque still has not implemented constexpr for its methods.

My confusion is that std::array guarantees that its elements are stored on the stack; just like a normal C-style array, so it should be computed at compile time, but std::vector allocates memory on the heap so if it's evaluated at compile time, so is deque, right?

Thanks!

Answer 1

According to https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/665 which keeps a log of the progression of the proposal through the standards committee process, there seem to have been some doubts whether a constexpr std::deque can be implemented without core language changes.

Unfortunately it doesn't say what the specific concern is. Probably some common implementation makes use of some language construct that specifically is not allowed in constant expressions or the implementation relies on some construct that is undefined behavior according to the standard. The latter is usually not a problem for the standard library, since it is not bound by the language rules and can make assumptions about the particular compiler's behavior. However in constant expressions core language undefined behavior is always a hard error and therefore such constructs might often not be usable in constant expression contexts without introducing magic compiler workarounds.

As mentioned in the linked github issue, there seem to also be some library facilities which need to have constexpr added to make this work as well.

Aside from such issues, generally, I don't think there is any reason to not make all containers and container adaptors constexpr -friendly now that std::allocator can be used in constant expressions. They probably just want to make sure that they can be properly implemented as constexpr first. My guess is that for the same reason only std::string and std::vector were done with C++20, since these are the simplest and most important allocator-aware containers to apply constexpr to. ( std::array has been constexpr for longer since it doesn't require any dynamic allocations.)

Although, looking at the date of the last entry in the issue (as well as the accompanying issues for std::list , std::priority_queue , etc.) it seems to not have progressed in the last two years, maybe because the author of the proposal did not pursue it further, but I can't really tell.

---

In either case, when we say that std::vector (or other allocator-aware containers) are constexpr -friendly, this means something else than it does for eg std::array . You can declare a constexpr std::array variable and use it as you would use a const std::array variables, but you can't declare a constexpr std::vector variable (generally at all) and use it as you would a const std::vector .

What you can do however is use a std::vector variable in eg a constexpr function to do some calculations, as long as the variable is created after the evaluation of the constant expression starts and is destroyed before it ends. Currently this is not possible with eg a std::list which is not constexpr -friendly.

The reason for this is that the compiler will not actually allocate memory at compile-time for the container and then transfer it in some way into a runtime allocation (whether static or dynamic). Instead dynamic allocations at compile-time are separate from runtime ones and must be deallocated before the constant expression evaluation in which they were allocated ends.