在主UI线程上提升.NET中的事件

Question

I'm developing a class library in .NET that other developers will consume eventually. This library makes use of a few worker threads, and those threads fire status events that will cause some UI controls to be updated in the WinForms / WPF application.

Normally, for every update, you would need to check the .InvokeRequired property on WinForms or equivalent WPF property and invoke this on the main UI thread for updating. This can get old quickly, and something doesn't feel right about making the end developer do this, so...

Is there any way that my library can fire/invoke the events/delegates from the main UI thread?

In particular...

1. Should I automatically "detect" the "main" thread to use?
2. If not, should I require the end developer to call some (pseudo) UseThisThreadForEvents() method when the application starts so I can grab the target thread from that call?

Answer 1

Your library could check the Target of each delegate in the event's invocation list, and marshal the call to the target thread if that target is ISynchronizeInvoke:

private void RaiseEventOnUIThread(Delegate theEvent, object[] args)
{
  foreach (Delegate d in theEvent.GetInvocationList())
  {
    ISynchronizeInvoke syncer = d.Target as ISynchronizeInvoke;
    if (syncer == null)
    {
      d.DynamicInvoke(args);
    }
    else
    {
      syncer.BeginInvoke(d, args);  // cleanup omitted
    }
  }
}

Another approach, which makes the threading contract more explicit, is to require clients of your library to pass in an ISynchronizeInvoke or SynchronizationContext for the thread on which they want you to raise events. This gives users of your library a bit more visibility and control than the "secretly check the delegate target" approach.

In regard to your second question, I would place the thread marshalling stuff within your OnXxx or whatever API the user code calls that could result in an event being raised.

Answer 2

Here's itwolson's idea expressed as an extension method which is working great for me:

/// <summary>Extension methods for EventHandler-type delegates.</summary>
public static class EventExtensions
{
    /// <summary>Raises the event (on the UI thread if available).</summary>
    /// <param name="multicastDelegate">The event to raise.</param>
    /// <param name="sender">The source of the event.</param>
    /// <param name="e">An EventArgs that contains the event data.</param>
    /// <returns>The return value of the event invocation or null if none.</returns>
    public static object Raise(this MulticastDelegate multicastDelegate, object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        object retVal = null;

        MulticastDelegate threadSafeMulticastDelegate = multicastDelegate;
        if (threadSafeMulticastDelegate != null)
        {
            foreach (Delegate d in threadSafeMulticastDelegate.GetInvocationList())
            {
                var synchronizeInvoke = d.Target as ISynchronizeInvoke;
                if ((synchronizeInvoke != null) && synchronizeInvoke.InvokeRequired)
                {
                    retVal = synchronizeInvoke.EndInvoke(synchronizeInvoke.BeginInvoke(d, new[] { sender, e }));
                }
                else
                {
                    retVal = d.DynamicInvoke(new[] { sender, e });
                }
            }
        }

        return retVal;
    }
}

You then just raise your event like so:

MyEvent.Raise(this, EventArgs.Empty);

Answer 3

您可以使用SynchronizationContext类通过使用SynchronizationContext.Current来对WinForms或WPF中的UI线程进行编组调度。

Answer 4

I liked Mike Bouk's answer (+1) so much, I incorporated it into my codebase. I am concerned that his DynamicInvoke call will throw a runtime exception if the Delegate it invokes is not an EventHandler delegate, due to mismatched parameters. And since you're in a background thread, I assume you may want to call the UI method asynchronously and that you are not concerned with whether it ever finishes.

My version below can only be used with EventHandler delegates and will ignore other delegates in its invocation list. Since EventHandler delegates return nothing, we don't need the result. This allows me to call EndInvoke after the asynchronous process completes by passing the EventHandler in the BeginInvoke call. The call will return this EventHandler in IAsyncResult.AsyncState by way of the AsynchronousCallback, at which point EventHandler.EndInvoke is called.

/// <summary>
/// Safely raises any EventHandler event asynchronously.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="sender">The object raising the event (usually this).</param>
/// <param name="e">The EventArgs for this event.</param>
public static void Raise(this MulticastDelegate thisEvent, object sender, 
    EventArgs e)
{
  EventHandler uiMethod; 
  ISynchronizeInvoke target; 
  AsyncCallback callback = new AsyncCallback(EndAsynchronousEvent);

  foreach (Delegate d in thisEvent.GetInvocationList())
  {
    uiMethod = d as EventHandler;
    if (uiMethod != null)
    {
      target = d.Target as ISynchronizeInvoke; 
      if (target != null) target.BeginInvoke(uiMethod, new[] { sender, e }); 
      else uiMethod.BeginInvoke(sender, e, callback, uiMethod);
    }
  }
}

private static void EndAsynchronousEvent(IAsyncResult result) 
{ 
  ((EventHandler)result.AsyncState).EndInvoke(result); 
}

And the usage:

MyEventHandlerEvent.Raise(this, MyEventArgs);

Answer 5

You can store the dispatcher for the main thread in your library, use it to check if you are running on the UI thread, and execute on the UI thread through it if necessary.

The WPF threading documentation provides a good introduction and samples on how to do this.

Here is the gist of it:

private Dispatcher _uiDispatcher;

// Call from the main thread
public void UseThisThreadForEvents()
{
     _uiDispatcher = Dispatcher.CurrentDispatcher;
}

// Some method of library that may be called on worker thread
public void MyMethod()
{
    if (Dispatcher.CurrentDispatcher != _uiDispatcher)
    {
        _uiDispatcher.Invoke(delegate()
        {
            // UI thread code
        });
    }
    else
    {
         // UI thread code
    }
}

Answer 6

I found relying on the method being an EventHandler doesn't always work and ISynchronizeInvoke doesn't work for WPF. My attempt therefore looks like this, it may help someone:

public static class Extensions
{
    // Extension method which marshals events back onto the main thread
    public static void Raise(this MulticastDelegate multicast, object sender, EventArgs args)
    {
        foreach (Delegate del in multicast.GetInvocationList())
        {
            // Try for WPF first
            DispatcherObject dispatcherTarget = del.Target as DispatcherObject;
            if (dispatcherTarget != null && !dispatcherTarget.Dispatcher.CheckAccess())
            {
                // WPF target which requires marshaling
                dispatcherTarget.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(del, sender, args);
            }
            else
            {
                // Maybe its WinForms?
                ISynchronizeInvoke syncTarget = del.Target as ISynchronizeInvoke;
                if (syncTarget != null && syncTarget.InvokeRequired)
                {
                    // WinForms target which requires marshaling
                    syncTarget.BeginInvoke(del, new object[] { sender, args });
                }
                else
                {
                    // Just do it.
                    del.DynamicInvoke(sender, args);
                }
            }
        }
    }
    // Extension method which marshals actions back onto the main thread
    public static void Raise<T>(this Action<T> action, T args)
    {
        // Try for WPF first
        DispatcherObject dispatcherTarget = action.Target as DispatcherObject;
        if (dispatcherTarget != null && !dispatcherTarget.Dispatcher.CheckAccess())
        {
            // WPF target which requires marshaling
            dispatcherTarget.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(action, args);
        }
        else
        {
            // Maybe its WinForms?
            ISynchronizeInvoke syncTarget = action.Target as ISynchronizeInvoke;
            if (syncTarget != null && syncTarget.InvokeRequired)
            {
                // WinForms target which requires marshaling
                syncTarget.BeginInvoke(action, new object[] { args });
            }
            else
            {
                // Just do it.
                action.DynamicInvoke(args);
            }
        }
    }
}

Answer 7

I like these answers and examples but inherently by standard you are writing the library all wrong. It's important not to marshal your events to other threads for the sake of others. Keep your events fired where they are and handled where they belong. When the time comes for that event to change threads it's important to let the end developer do that at that point in time.

Answer 8

I know this is an old thread, but seeing as it really helped me get started on building something similar, so I want to share my code. Using the new C#7 features, I was able to create a thread aware Raise function. It uses the EventHandler delegate template, and the C#7 pattern matching, and LINQ to filter and set type.

public static void ThreadAwareRaise<TEventArgs>(this EventHandler<TEventArgs> customEvent,
    object sender, TEventArgs e) where TEventArgs : EventArgs
{
    foreach (var d in customEvent.GetInvocationList().OfType<EventHandler<TEventArgs>>())
        switch (d.Target)
        {
            case DispatcherObject dispatchTartget:
                dispatchTartget.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(d, sender, e);
                break;
            case ISynchronizeInvoke syncTarget when syncTarget.InvokeRequired:
                syncTarget.BeginInvoke(d, new[] {sender, e});
                break;
            default:
                d.Invoke(sender, e);
                break;
        }
}